Search for: "Chevron U.S.A. inc." Results 161 - 180 of 401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Berg, 279 F.3d 684,696 (9th Cir. 2002) (citing Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 5:31 am by Caitlin Byars
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 781 F2d 1067 to determine that a substantial connection means spending more than 30% of employment aboard a vessel. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
” In administrative law, she was not an early adherent to agency deference in statutory interpretation: The Supreme Court unanimously reversed then- Judge Ginsburg in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:59 am
Whether the Eleventh Circuit correctly held, under Step One of the analysis set forth in Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:59 pm by Anna P. Lazarus
  In his view, the expansive deference provided by the Supreme Court in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 10:00 pm
In deciding the ClearCorrect case, the Federal Circuit reviewed Section 337 under the two-part test outlined in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm by WIMS
Because the district court erred when it failed to consider Plaintiffs' FLPMA claim under the framework and with the deference set forth in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:01 am by Jon Robinson
  On the surface, it seems to be a natural corollary–indeed, an a fortiori application–of the rule that we will defer to an agency’s interpretation of the statute it is charged with implementing, see Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 6:01 am by Jon Robinson
On the surface, it seems to be a natural corollary–indeed, an a fortiori application–of the rule that we will defer to an agency’s interpretation of the statute it is charged with implementing, see Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:00 am by Jody Simon
This was the doctrine established in Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am by David S. Dessen, Esq.
The Court concluded that since the statute was ambiguous and the Secretary’s interpretation reasonable, the Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am by David S. Dessen, Esq.
The Court concluded that since the statute was ambiguous and the Secretary’s interpretation reasonable, the Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]