Search for: "Chevron USA Holdings, Inc." Results 41 - 60 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2013, 5:31 pm by Deborah Rosenthal
The majority was also right in holding that in-lieu fees and monetary exactions, off-site or on-site, should be subject to the same rules as property exactions. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:31 pm
The majority was also right in holding that in-lieu fees and monetary exactions, off-site or on-site, should be subject to the same rules as property exactions. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
Mead Corp., for example, his opinion articulated a number of factors to consider when determining the deference due an administrative agency’s interpretation of a statute it administers—thereby limiting the reach of the Court’s more straightforward (and therefore easier to apply) holding in Chevron USA, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:28 pm by WIMS
      In a strongly worded and lengthy dissenting opinion, the one Justice summarizes, "Because Congress 'has directly spoken to the precise question at issue,' Chevron USA Inc. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:13 pm by Schachtman
Chevron USA, Inc., 2010 WL 99272, *14-15 (S.D.Ohio 2010) (addressing a meta-analysis by Dr. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm by Keith Rizzardi
9 is ambiguous, that we must apply the deference principles set forth in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
Smith Distributing Company, Inc. entered into an agreement with the U.S. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Report and Blog)   Global - Patents New exchange, Intellectual Property Exchange International, can be a game-changer, but will need good patents to thrive (IAM) (Technology Transfer Tactics)   Australia Bittersweet decision for Mars but Cadbury settles purple dispute: Mars Australia Pty Ltd v Sweet Rewards Pty Ltd (Managing IP) (ipwars)   Belgium Belgian Supreme Court prohibits fishing expeditions: Ineos Manufacturing Belgium NV and Ineos Services… [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 1:24 am
Inc. to hold in trust AIG stock for AIG's benefit was unenforceable. [read post]