Search for: "Chicago Bridge & Iron"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 3:00 am
This Jones Day memo addresses the implications of the Chancery Court’s recent decision in Chicago Bridge & Iron v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
In Chicago Bridge & Iron v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 12:01 pm
Bridges are a mainstay of Chicago’s outstanding architecture and skyline, but did you know Chicago has the most movable bridges in the world? [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 7:14 am
According to the Houston Business Journal, Horton CBI, a subsidiary of Chicago Bridge & Iron, has secured a $150 million contract from Terasen Gas (Vancouver Island) Inc. to build an LNG storage facility on Vancouver Island in British Columbia. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:48 am
The Texas-based engineering company has agreed to buy rival Shaw Group in a cash-and-stock deal worth $3 billion. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:48 am
The Texas-based engineering company has agreed to buy a rival, the Shaw Group, in a cash-and-stock deal worth $3 billion. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:48 am
The Texas-based engineering company has agreed to buy rival Shaw Group in a cash-and-stock deal worth $3 billion. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:28 pm
On October 11, 2004, the plaintiff, Robert Petrouski, a journeyman ironworker, was working below a bridge deck that was being demolished by the defendant Brandenburg at 95th and Baltimore in the City of Chicago. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:00 am
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:28 pm
A Cook County jury has entered its verdict for a Chicago ironworker who tripped over demolition debris at a construction site. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co., No. 12-2059 (3rd Cir. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:00 am
Chicago Bridge & Iron Co., No. 12-2059 (3rd Cir. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:00 am
The Delaware Supreme Court's recent decision in Chicago Bridge & Iron v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 9:52 am
Others, like loading and stacking iron and steel, pose moderate dangers. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 5:41 pm
See Chicago Bridge & Iron Co, N.V. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:11 pm
The case of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 11:43 am
Chicago Bridge & Iron, the Third Circuit held that Section113(f) of CERCLA allows a PRP to seek contribution from another PRP for cleanup of a contaminated Pennsylvania site even though the PRP seeking contribution resolved its environmental liability with Pennsylvania regulators under a pair of state statutes. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:03 pm
” (citing Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
The defending parties included the Chicago Bridge and Iron Company collective (“CB&I”). [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:33 am
Ct. 842, 694 N.E.2d 381 (1998), review denied (Mass. 1999) and Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. v. [read post]
