Search for: "Chip Alexander"
Results 41 - 60
of 112
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2019, 12:59 pm
The Commerce Department’s entity list decision further exacerbates tensions with China and puts Huawei in a difficult position given its reliance on U.S. chips. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
So, what if I hold a patent in a complex product – say a chip for mobile devices – and you build smartphones using my chip without a licence? [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 3:02 pm
Photo courtesy of ©Nobel Media AB/Alexander Mahmoud. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 11:12 am
If all integers of a standards-essential patent are found in the chip, it is argued, then damages should be a percentage of the price of the chip, not a percentage of the price of the handset. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 3:19 am
Kat friend, Alexander de Leeuw at Dutch IP firm, Brinkhof, reports: Auctioning Art(ificial Intelligence): The IP implications of Edmond de Belamy. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 9:33 am
Alexander regarding the Commission’s apparent strategy, in filing certain lawsuits, to “achieve a maximum amount of publicity. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
It has been seen as a detective novel, an attack on radical youth, a study in “alienation” and criminal psychopathology, a work of prophecy (the attempt on the life of Tsar Alexander II by the nihilist student Dimitri Karakosov took place while the book was at the printer’s, and some even saw the Tsar’s murder in 1881 as a fulfillment of Dostoyevsky’s warning), an indictment of urban social conditions in 19th century Russia, a religious epic and a proto –… [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” Trump may succeed over time in chipping away at the Justice Department’s independence. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 8:16 am
Edison’s original draftsman, Latimer drafted the plans for Alexander Graham Bell’s telephone. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:03 pm
All three justifications, I argue, are incredibly facile and serve only to obfuscate the Trump Administration’s intention to use the livelihood of hundreds of thousands of Dreamers as a political bargaining chip. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 1:55 pm
A/k/a “The Alexander Hamilton Law. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
It has been seen as a detective novel, an attack on radical youth, a study in “alienation” and criminal psychopathology, a work of prophecy (the attempt on the life of Tsar Alexander II by the nihilist student Dimitri Karakosov took place while the book was at the printer’s, and some even saw the Tsar’s murder in 1881 as a fulfillment of Dostoyevsky’s warning), an indictment of urban social conditions in 19th century Russia, a religious epic and a proto –… [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 7:20 am
although I chip in with this post on mandatory and discretionary grounds. [read post]
Users will have to deal with uncertainty about post Brexit participation UK in Unitary Patent system
2 Dec 2016, 5:47 am
However, by agreeing to ratify with apparently no strings attached at this stage, there is no bargaining chip remaining and instead there seems to be reliance on goodwill. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 10:47 am
He even suggested that Seleznev might be used as a bargaining chip in exchange for Edward Snowden. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 10:30 pm
I say with all this fanciful talk you might as well chip in and say what about if there is a peanut farmer from Georgia as president? [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:37 pm
If I had the time and the inclination, I could be out there chipping in when able, offering (I hope) reasonably coherent snippets of advice (appropriately limited so as not to make my insurers’ hair stand on end no doubt), to the benefit of those individuals who might not otherwise have any support. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 5:13 am
Alexander Pearl has published “Paint Chip Indians” in UNBOUND: the Harvard Journal of the Legal Left. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 5:56 am
“Labor union bosses should not be allowed to hold the economy hostage, nor should they be allowed to use the livelihoods and jobs of millions of Americans as bargaining chips. [read post]
28 May 2015, 7:44 am
Alexander Hamilton explained why, in The Federalist No. 83. [read post]
