Search for: "Christian Louboutin"
Results 61 - 80
of 238
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2013, 4:28 pm
– 9th Circuit Court of Appeals petition for rehearing – April 4, 2013 Designer Denied Say in Louboutin Mark Change: Courthouse News: http://www.entlawdigest.com/2013/03/13/2220.htm Original case was Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:11 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 7:21 am
We know from our prior post regarding Tiffany’s amicus brief filed in support of Christian Louboutin that Tiffany actively protects its brand. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:44 pm
Back in September of 2012, the Second Circuit issued an important fact specific ruling in regards to Christian Louboutin‘s trademark covering the red sole of their shoe in that protection will remain only when the red outsole is contrasted with the “upper” of the shoe. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:09 am
Louboutin was in the mind of Caroline von Nussbaum (SJ Berwin, Munich) too: Merpel once entered a store And exclaimed “These shoes I adore! [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 7:15 am
Trademark Registration No. 3,361,597, held by Christian Louboutin and dated January 1, 2008, is limited to a red lacquered outsole on footwear that contrasts with the color of the adjoining (“upper”) portion of the shoe. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:30 pm
Louboutin red bottom shoes monograph created by christian louboutin footwear on sale, distinguished for his attractively constructed hand crafted footwear, specifically his elegantly attractive stilettos. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 4:00 am
Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 4:56 pm
As we mentioned, Christian Louboutin has been embroiled in a lengthy suit with other fashion brands over the color red. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:00 am
” On the glamorous side, Net-a-Porter has a dreamy collection of designer cases, including this from Bottega Veneta, a spiked edition from Christian Louboutin and, if it’s bedazzled or nothing for you, there’s Jimmy Choo’s glitter-finished leather iPad sleeve (a steal at $495). [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 12:37 pm
Waits for FCPA Guidance, UK Bribery Act Gets an Update Venable LLP in Nonprofit Quarterly (NPQ): - Breast Cancer Awareness Month Criticized for “Little Pink Lies” Morgan Lewis in Ars Technica: - Senator wants to bring copyright law to the runway Proskauer Rose LLP in HR Morning: - Background checks: What’s changing in 2013 Greenberg Glusker in Staffing Talk: - Staffing News Of The Day, October 17, 2012 Patton Boggs LLP in POWER Magazine: - Regulators Cannot Move Fast Enough to… [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 11:29 am
(YSL), in favor of Christian Louboutin. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
In a decision of 5 September 2012, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the red soles used in Christian Louboutin’s shoes were a "distinctive symbol that qualifies for trade mark protection" and therefore a valid and enforceable trademark. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 6:25 am
In a decision of 5 September 2012, the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in New York ruled that the red soles used in Christian Louboutin’s shoes were a "distinctive symbol that qualifies for trade mark protection" and therefore a valid and enforceable trademark. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 1:13 pm
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
As a result, the appeal of Christian Louboutin (“Louboutin”) was not successful and the fashion atelier Yves Saint Laurent (“YSL”) was not enjoined from using a red sole as part of a monochrome red shoe. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 10:44 am
As a result, the appeal of Christian Louboutin (“Louboutin”) was not successful and the fashion atelier Yves Saint Laurent (“YSL”) was not enjoined from using a red sole as part of a monochrome red shoe. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
The popular Christian Louboutin (CL) shoes’ red sole trademark is readily recognized by the consuming public. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:41 pm
Written by Susan Neuberger Weller In its recent decision in Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 8:28 am
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. [read post]
