Search for: "Christine B. Guy"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2010, 9:04 am
A week and a half before the election, Gawker posted a tell-all piece (complete with pictures) written by a guy who had an aborted one night stand with Christine three years ago. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 10:44 am
Woldow and Douglas B. [read post]
22 Sep 2018, 3:19 am
It’s not my normal approach to b indecisive. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
Guy Rub: reminds him of Wendy Gordon’s anti dissemination motives from the 1980s—sounds like manybe all of these would be washed away by fair use. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 10:13 pm
I’m noticing that everywhere I go, someone has a release form to sign and and guy like this shooting video. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 12:00 am
§§ 2252A(a)(1), (a)(2)(A), (a)(5)(B). [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am
But so much time has been wasted obsessing over a famous guy using a fake word that it has distracted attention from another story in the news, involving an important decision made for dubious reasons that many will second-guess. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:04 pm
See Christine A. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 8:43 am
On this morning the guy driving her is-not the same one she returned with later that night. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 4:01 am
If he doesn’t have the guts to do so, why should they be the bad guys? [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 9:38 am
“You guys are missing a huge story about O’Melveny,” a tipster recently told us. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Humira: 5 biosimilars approved, none on the market; some will be entering, but only b/c of patent settlement agreements. 11 years earlier than otherwise might be possible. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 3:20 pm
These guys, however, don't give an inch, while everyone else is still in the reality-based community that they know and love. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 10:12 am
Take a look — this is good, thoughtful law blogging for a guy with two consecutive capital letters in one name. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 7:36 am
Some stuff that was just incomprehensible to me, like Section 33(b)(6), I now know why that was there, and I now know why other things are not there, like the fact that there is no definition in the statute of likelihood of confusion; or how one comes to own a mark; or secondary meaning... [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Adams B. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
And it was me and the three judges, and then of course there was a guy representing DOJ. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 4:00 am
Décision La juge ne bénéficiait pas des enseignements de l’arrêt R. c. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Clark, Drew Clark, Michael B. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
Then there’s the trader who uses the mark in Country B—potential consumer deception. [read post]
