Search for: "City of Tigard"
Results 1 - 20
of 129
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2024, 3:14 pm
City of Tigard (1994)512 U. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:58 pm
City of Tigard. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm
Seven years later, in Dolan v City of Tigard, the Court returned to its newly-minted “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm
City of Tigard, the Court ruled that state and local governments sometimes violate the Takings Clause when they impose "exactions" as a condition of allowing property owners to develop their land. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
City of Tigard, 512 U. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
City of Tigard, Oregon. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 37 4, 391 (1994). [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 3:53 pm
City of Tigard, the court required scrutiny of permit conditions to ensure they did not run afoul of the Constitution. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:58 am
City of Tigard, Oregon simply because it is authorized by legislation. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:52 pm
City of Tigard, Oregon. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:42 pm
City of Tigard, the court held that if a government wants to require a resident to give up property for a land-use permit, it must demonstrate that the condition imposed on the property owner is legitimately related and proportional to the effects of the proposed land use. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 7:35 am
City of Tigard, the Supreme Court held that if a government wants to require someone to give up property in exchange for a land-use permit, it must show that such a condition is closely related and roughly proportional to the effects of the proposed land use. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 7:42 am
Seven years later, in Dolan v City of Tigard, the Court returned to its newly-minted “unconstitutional conditions” doctrine. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:31 pm
City of Tigard, Oregon simply because it is authorized by legislation. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 8:59 am
City of Tigard, the Supreme Court outlined a two-part test for courts to use to determine whether state or local governments violate the Constitution’s ban on uncompensated takings by conditioning the grant of a development permit on the developer’s agreement to set aside land, pay money, or provide materials or services. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 12:17 pm
Tigard, Tualatin, Sherwood, and Wilsonville today are exactly what the McCall folks didn't want in 1970.In the '90s, frustrated builders decided to try their hand at the apartment business, with Portland as Ground Zero. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 6:13 pm
We want our cities back. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 4:10 am
Max Williams, the former state legislator from Tigard who ran the prisons for a while, seems to have it right. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:45 pm
City of Tigard, Oregon simply because it is authorized by legislation. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 6:01 pm
City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994) “. . . applies only to individualized, adjudicative land-use decisions, not legislative, generally applicable development ordinances like the ones at issue in this case. [read post]
