Search for: "Clarence E Washington"
Results 81 - 100
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2018, 1:31 pm
Consovoy (George Mason 2001 / E. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Justice Clarence Thomas concurred to write that he should have joined the Quill dissent in 1992. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
” In an op-ed for The Washington Post, Katrina vanden Heuvel argues that Janus v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
Hawaii in a pithy headline for the Washington Post: “In travel ban case, Supreme Court considers ‘the president’ vs. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:17 am
” At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Andrew Michaels discusses SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 9:30 am
Could Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Clarence Thomas be the new Scalia/Ginsburg? [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
The first is Washington v. [read post]
6 Apr 2018, 1:21 pm
§ 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
All activity in Washington, D.C., may have ground to a halt because of snow, but the Supreme Court has entered a time of unparalleled productivity on the relist front. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the “centers seemed to have a strong supporter in Justice Anthony M. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:59 am
” A 1991 study by sociologists E. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:36 am
Please register via Eventbrite: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/conversation-with-the-honorable-clarence-thomas-tickets-41455844547 Professor Gregory E. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow report that “[t]he court ruled unanimously that the officers could not be held liable for making the arrests after they came upon a scene of ‘utter Bacchanalia,’ as Justice Clarence Thomas described it in announcing the decision, at a house party where the homeowner was not present and it was unclear if the guests had been invited. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
” Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Democracy in America blog agrees that “[b]eing perceived by the public as an honest broker unwedded to party or ideology is an increasingly elusive but fervent wish of many of the justices—particularly the chief. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:25 pm
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and Judge Jerry E. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 3:25 pm
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and Judge Jerry E. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:38 am
The Supreme Court in Washington. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:42 am
” Briefly: In an op-ed in The Washington Examiner, Roger Pilon weighs in on Murr v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am
Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas would have said, basically, “almost always no. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:14 pm
Judge Diane E. [read post]
