Search for: "Clarence Key" Results 1 - 20 of 799
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court Divided Over Key Charge Against Jan. 6 Rioters and Trump MSN – Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 4/16/2024 The U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:39 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: Supreme Court gives skeptical eye to key statute used to prosecute Jan. 6 rioters (Nina Totenberg, NPR) Takeaways from the Supreme Court’s arguments over obstruction charge used against January 6 rioters (John Fritze, Marshall Cohen, Tierney Sneed, & Hannah Rabinowitz, CNN) Justice Clarence Thomas misses Supreme Court arguments (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) Supreme Court, in an emergency order, lets Idaho enforce ban on transgender… [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:10 pm by Ilya Somin
Here are some key passages from the unanimous Supreme Court ruling written by Justice Clarence Thomas: The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment states: "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 5:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
This time felt different because now the key event was a recognition of the persistence of racism and a seeming commitment to dismantle it. [read post]
28 Mar 2024, 10:15 am by Ronald Mann
Justice Clarence Thomas, for example, pointedly asked, “[i]f a very interested buyer showed up the day after Michael died, would Thomas sell the business to him for 3.86 million? [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Amy Howe
When asked by Justice Clarence Thomas to explain what kind of evidence plaintiffs could use to show that they had been singled out, Reaves posited that it could “be a variety of different types of evidence in different situations. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 11:24 am by Ronald Mann
Justice Clarence Thomas seemed to share the same straightforward view. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am by Scott Bomboy
During the 1990s a key Supreme Court decision shut down one proposed path to term limits on Congress: action taken by the states to place their own qualifications on their members of the Senate and House. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 6:56 am by Scott Bomboy
” He also quoted in part a dissent from Justice Clarence Thomas in Trump v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:16 am by Amy Howe
It argued that the courts of appeals are divided – a key consideration for the Supreme Court in deciding whether to grant review – on whether bias-response teams chill students’ speech. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 11:26 am by Scott Bomboy
” Alito was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 2:52 pm by Rachel Casper
Thomas More Award from Boston College Law School in 2001, and the Thurgood Marshall Award, in 2008, and the Clarence Earl Gideon Award, in 2020, from the Committee for Public Counsel Services. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 4:48 pm by Daphne Keller
Clarence Thomas has been the most outspoken on relevant topics, strongly expressing concerns about major platforms’ power over public discourse. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:52 pm by Amy Howe
Justice Clarence Thomas asked Beard whether the court needed to do anything more than decide “whether Nollan/Dolan scrutiny applies to” legislative enactments. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:44 pm by John Elwood
The court summarily denied that request in April 2022, but Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch indicated that they would have granted relief. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 8:10 am by John Floyd
  Many have argued that Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas is such a justice—a man who enjoys the perks and payola of power. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 1:42 pm by Amy Howe
” If the key fact is the Sacklers’ willingness to contribute to the settlement, she asked, why can’t they ask for anything and say that it’s necessary? [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
During that time, she was the court’s key vote on a wide range of issues, including abortion, affirmative action, and religion. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am by John Elwood
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of certiorari, arguing that it “seems illogical and unfair” to relax the common-law requirement that collateral estoppel bind litigants in later litigation only when both parties are the same. [read post]