Search for: "Clark v. Google, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
The decision, which the company says will be implemented before the law takes effect, will cover search, Google News, and Google Discover. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
Osborne Clarke and Bristows published articles summarising the guidance. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:51 am by Karina Lytvynska
By Atreya Mathur “By far, the greatest danger of Artificial Intelligence is that people conclude too early that they understand it. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
Today [August 11], the Federal Trade Commission initiated a proceeding to examine whether we should implement new rules addressing data practices that are unfair or deceptive. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 2:36 pm by Aaron Moss
(The transformative use doctrine did play a role in Google v. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
Stewart v Clarke [2021] WASC 285 – an application to strike out a defence in a defamation case in the Supreme Court of Western Australia. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 11:04 am by Eugene Volokh
And in the process the Court endorsed the view of five concurring and dissenting Justices in Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Clarke v Nursing and Midwifery Council of New South Wales [2020] NSWDC 641 Scotting DCJ dismissed claims for libel based on an email and other matters. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 6:43 am by Kevin Kaufman
The revenue thresholds may be designed around companies like Google and Facebook, but Maryland businesses—including many small businesses—are the ones actually paying. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
In the same way that Collins is undermined by the subequent decisions in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2016] QB 1003, [2015] EWCA Civ 311 (27 March 2015) and Case C–362/14 Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (ECLI:EU:C:2015:650; CJEU, 6 October 2015), so Murphy is undermined by the subsequent decisions in Lloyd v Google LLC [2019] EWCA Civ 1599 (02 October 2019)… [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
And, in Murphy v Callinan [2018] IESC 59 (30 November 2018) [36]-[44], Baker J (Clarke CJ and Dunne J concurring) in the Supreme Court approved Feeney J’s analysis in Collins (I will return to this case in a future post). [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
FIL Ltd v Fidelis Underwriting [2018] EWHC 1097, High Court of England and Wales (May 2018)The use of FIDELIS for specialty insurance and reinsurance services does not infringe FIDELITY for financial services, holds Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]