Search for: "Clark v. Hale"
Results 21 - 40
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:34 am
The panel consisted of Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Wilson, Carnwath and Hodge. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
Without a doubt, the appellants must surely be equally delighted with the outcome in their case because Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Clarke and Reed unanimously held that the burden of proving a “marriage of convenience” falls on the Home Office. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The majority (Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lords Sumption, Clarke and Reed) noted that the appellant was seeking to prohibit the reporting of matters discussed at public trial. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
Moreover, Maaouia v France (2001) 33 EHRR 42 undid any art 6 grounds since civil rights had not been determined. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
Hence, in Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012) [46] Lord Kerr (Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed concurring) held: The particular circumstances affecting the individual whose personal data would be revealed on foot of a Norwich Pharmacal Order will always call for close consideration and these may, in some limited instances, displace the interests of the applicant for the… [read post]
22 May 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
In the hearing Lady Hale remarked that it is “always much more satisfactory to think of the child as a real person and name the child”. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am
The minority (Lady Hale and Lords Kerr and Clarke) considered that the notice read like a mere request and should have been firmer: paragraphs 103, 122, and 155. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 4:52 am
Please let us know if any of the information below is inaccurate or if we have omitted any relevant cases: Supreme Court Cases PNM v Times Newspapers,17 and 18 January 2017 – (Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Kerr, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Reed). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Today’s live blog team comprises Emma Cross (Olswang), Matt Clark (CMS), Byron Phillips (Nabarro), Rachel Wilson (Olswang), Clementine Bottet (Nabarro) & Jessica Foley (CMS). 16:30: The court has adjourned for the day. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 1:50 am
The panel will be Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Hughes, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 8:44 am
Lord Kerr and Lady Hale each gave separate dissenting judgments. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Clarke, Wilson, and Hughes. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:45 am
The Supreme Court appeal was heard by a panel of five Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Supreme Court Judgment The wife’s appeal was heard together with Mrs Gohil’s on 8, 9 and 10 June 2015 before Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke, Wilson, Sumption, Reed and Hodge. [read post]
