Search for: "Clark v. Hale"
Results 41 - 60
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
In the Supreme Court the majority (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke) preferred a broader construction than the minority (Lord Judge, Lord Brown, Lord Rodger and Lord Walker) would have adopted. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
Lord Kerr, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke dismissed National Grid’s appeal against this ruling. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am
Starting on the morning of 5 December 2011 Lords Phillips, Mance, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson will hear the eight day appeals of the Employer’s Liability Insurance “Trigger” Litigation. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Lady Hale also agreed that the Court in Bressol did not accept the A-G’s reasoning. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The majority (Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lords Sumption, Clarke and Reed) noted that the appellant was seeking to prohibit the reporting of matters discussed at public trial. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am
The appeal was heard by a five justice panel of Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Kerr, Clarke and Reed. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:01 pm
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
Her appeal was unanimously allowed by LJs Hale, Clarke, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:51 am
Lord Mance, with whom Lady Hale agreed, and Lord Clarke give dissenting judgments. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
In the hearing Lady Hale remarked that it is “always much more satisfactory to think of the child as a real person and name the child”. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
Without a doubt, the appellants must surely be equally delighted with the outcome in their case because Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Clarke and Reed unanimously held that the burden of proving a “marriage of convenience” falls on the Home Office. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 11:27 am
First, Adamas Limited v Mrs Yong Ting Ping How Fok Cheung will be heard on Tuesday 28 June 2011 by Lady Hale, Lord Mance and Lord Clarke. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
Hence, in Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012) [46] Lord Kerr (Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed concurring) held: The particular circumstances affecting the individual whose personal data would be revealed on foot of a Norwich Pharmacal Order will always call for close consideration and these may, in some limited instances, displace the interests of the applicant for the… [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:22 am
SHELLE HALE, __ N.J. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:08 am
These appeals from the Court of Appeal (Civ) will be heard by Lady Hale and Lords Hope, Brown, Mance and Kerr. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Accordingly, the decision of the Board is affirmed.In Todd Allen Clark v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
Lord Reed gave a concurring judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed. [read post]
