Search for: "Clark v. Hale"
Results 41 - 60
of 144
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Clarke gave a dissenting judgment, with which Lady Hale agreed. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Clarke (with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Sumption agreed) gave judgment for the majority, finding that the policy of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (“PSNI”) to indefinitely retain the biometric data of adults convicted of recordable offences was proportionate. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:53 am
Lord Clarke gave a dissenting judgment, with which Lady Hale agreed, arguing that the costs recovery scheme was disproportionate because it did not treat all defendants in the same way and instead chose a certain class of defendants to impose liabilities beyond the bounds of what was reasonable or proportionate. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:34 am
Lord Clarke gave a dissenting judgment, with which Lady Hale agreed. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
The appeal was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, and Lord Clarke on 22 June 2015 and can be viewed on demand on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
Haile, on the other hand, attempts to steer a line between accepting the jurisprudence on intentionality but distinguishing it on a narrow basis (Lord Reed, with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed – Lord Neuberger, in the majority, doing so with hesitation, at [79]; Lord Carnwath dissenting). [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
In that judgment (with which both Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson agree) the Court carefully reviews the history of Wilkinson v. [read post]
Case Comment: R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [2014] UKSC 62
14 May 2015, 1:59 am
Lord Hodge (with whom Lords Clarke, Wilson and Toulson agreed) held that the licences granted to ZH and CN were not licences to occupy premises as a dwelling. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
Her appeal was unanimously allowed by LJs Hale, Clarke, Wilson, Hughes and Hodge. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
Lord Kerr, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke dismissed National Grid’s appeal against this ruling. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
In that judgment, the Appellants’ arguments on costs were referred for this further hearing, which took place on 9 to 12 February 2015 before a panel comprising seven justices: Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Mance, Clarke, Dyson, Sumption and Carnwatch. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 8:35 am
Three of the Justices (Neuberger, Hale and Clarke) expressly noted that there was room for considerable skepticism about the views reached but that in the absence of cross-examination it would be difficult to challenge them. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:49 am
Lords Neuberger, Clarke, Wilson, Toulson and Lady Hale will hear the appeal. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger Lady Hale, Lord Clarke Lord Wilson and Lord Toulson. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 4:04 pm
The panel will be Lord Neuberger Lady Hale, Lord Clarke Lord Wilson and Lord Toulson. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:01 pm
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Wilson and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:18 am
In the lead judgment, Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale, Lord Clarke, Lord Carnwath and Lord Hodge agreed) held that the non-disclosure of the commissions and the identity of those receiving them rendered the relationship unfair under section 140A(1)(c) of the Act. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:19 am
The lead judgment was given by Lady Hale, with Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed unanimously agreeing with her findings. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 10:08 am
Christopher Clarke LJ said this "[55]... [read post]
