Search for: "Clark v. Hale" Results 61 - 80 of 144
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Anthony Fairclough
Lord Reed gave a concurring judgment, with which Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:49 am by Ayesha Christie, Matrix
Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke and Lord Sumption considered whether the indefinite retention of fingerprints, photographs, DNA samples and DNA profiles of an individual convicted of a recordable offence is an interference with the right to respect for private life protected by ECHR art 8, and if so, whether such interference is justified. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm by Giles Peaker
Baroness Hale gave the leading speech, with which the other members of the Appellate Committee agreed. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
Lord Reed, with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed, held that the scheme did fall foul of the principle of legality. [read post]
Lord Reed, with whom Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale and Lord Clarke agreed, held that the scheme did fall foul of the principle of legality. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:42 am by Rosalind Earis, 6KBW
Judgment The judgment of the court was given by Lord Reed, with whom the rest of their Lordships (Lord Neuberger, Baroness Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke) agreed. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 1:52 am by Laura Sandwell
These ‘right to die’ cases will be heard by a panel of nine (L Neuberger, L Hale, L Mance, L Kerr, L Clarke, L Wilson, L Sumption, L Reed and L Hughes) from today until Thursday 19 December 2013. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Blog  Editorial
   West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra [2013] EWCA Civ 11 – granted on 3 July 2013 by Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:46 am by Rob Robinson
Federal Judge Shifts eDiscovery Cost in Potential Class Action - http://bit.ly/PBEZGU (Saranac Hale Spencer) Predictive Coding v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:36 am by Blog  Editorial
Lord Phillips – Law Lady Hale – Law Lord Mance – Law Lord Kerr – Law Lord Clarke – Law Lord Reed – Law Lord Carnwath – Law Lord Hope – Classics Lord Walker – Classics and Law Lord Dyson – Classics Lord Sumption – History Lord Wilson – Jurisprudence Lord Neuberger – Chemistry [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:49 am by Sam Murrant
In the news Lord Neuberger is to be our next Supreme Court President, replacing Lord Philips who is retiring and pipping rival candidates Lady Hale and Lord Mance. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:03 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
Following the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union on a preliminary reference, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Dyson) held a further hearing in this appeal on July 4. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am by Daniel West
The appeal was heard by a five justice panel of Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Kerr, Clarke and Reed. [read post]
28 May 2012, 2:33 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Sitting in the Supreme Court from Monday 28 May 2012 until Tuesday 29 May 2012 is the appeal of SerVaas Incorporated v Rafidian Bank & ors, heard by Lady Hale and Lords Phillips, Clarke, Sumption, and Reed. [read post]
21 May 2012, 6:42 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting on Monday 21 May 2012 in the Privy Council is the appeal of ANS & anor v ML, listed for two days in front of a panel of five (L Hope, L Hale, L Wilson, L Reed, L Carnwath). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 4:25 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
Starting today in the Supreme Court is the two day appeal of Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd, listed to be heard by Lords Walker, Clarke, Sumption, Reed, and Carnwath. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
The extra hearing is scheduled in order to hear representations on a number of important issues of principle in relation to the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, which were not fully explored at the original hearing, and will be heard by a panel of nine (Lady Hale, Lords Phillips, Walker, Judge, Kerr, Clarke, Wilson and Reed and Sir Anthony Hughes). [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:47 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  Lords Clarke and Dyson both indicated that they had intended to express an opinion on the point but had been persuaded that it was not right to do so in this case. [read post]