Search for: "Clark v. No Named Defendant" Results 61 - 80 of 553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36] (O’Donnell J)… [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:00 am by Riana Harvey
Whilst it had been submitted by opposing counsel that Wenman may have exaggerated this figure, HHJ Clarke went so far as to suggest that even if only 5% or 1% of her work was attributable to Archangel Alchemy (though HHJ Clarke considered on the evidence that it was more than that), this would be more than trivial and would have generated sufficient actual goodwill to be capable of damage by reason of a misrepresentation.HHJ Clarke dismissed claims that ‘The… [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Contending that three of the statements made by the County Executive were defamatory, Plaintiff sued Monroe County, among other named defendants [herein after collectively "Defendants"]. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Contending that three of the statements made by the County Executive were defamatory, Plaintiff sued Monroe County, among other named defendants [herein after collectively "Defendants"]. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
Clarke County Bd. of Educ., 857 F. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:41 am by PaulKostro
Plaintiffs are the defendant’s brother- and sister-in-law, and defendant’s mother-in-law. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
" In the Seventh Circuit, Jones v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 6:16 am by MBettman
Clark, 2008-Ohio-3748 (Due process requires that a defendant’s plea be made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily; otherwise, the defendant’s plea is invalid.) [read post]