Search for: "Clark v. No Named Defendant"
Results 81 - 100
of 556
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2021, 1:11 pm
There, the defendant, an investment capital company, asked plaintiff to audit a company that defendant was looking to invest in, a company named CAR. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Clark D. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:56 am
An Introduction to Listeria Listeria (pronounced liss-STEER-ē-uh) is a gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium that can grow under either anaerobic (without oxygen) or aerobic (with oxygen) conditions. [4, 18] Of the six species of Listeria, only L. monocytogenes(pronounced maw-NO-site-aw-JUH-neez) causes disease in humans. [18] These bacteria multiply best at 86-98.6 degrees F (30-37 degrees C), but also multiply better than all other bacteria at refrigerator temperatures, something that allows… [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 8:22 am
” Lee v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 1:39 pm
The right to move an occupier from one room to another is inconsistent with exclusive possession (see Westminster City Council v Clarke (1992) 2 AC 288). [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
I have defended marks with very little, but defeated marks with more. [read post]
26 May 2021, 2:22 pm
And then there was Del Rio Sanchez v Simple Properties Management Limited. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:11 am
Further, the retainer agreements between plaintiff and the insured govern this dispute, which provides a further basis for affirming the order (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. [read post]
8 May 2021, 1:54 pm
" But context matters, as [Clark County School District v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Google LLC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 9:07 am
Clark Equipment Company, reverses the district court’s grant of summary judgment to a lumber company that had been named as one of the defendants in the plaintiffs’ personal injury suit. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm
Because of the domicile of the Defendants, Mr Soriano required the Court’s permission to serve the claim on the Defendants out of the jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 2:20 pm
"); William Clark, Protecting the Privacies of Digital Life: Riley v. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
The deputy judge, Daniel Alexander QC, found there was no infringement by the Defendant in its use of the name “Photobox Free Prints” and that there was no passing off by the use of this name or the Defendant’s logo + word combination app icon, despite the Claimant having taken extensive steps to acquire a secondary meaning for its otherwise descriptive “FreePrints” name.But the deputy judge did find trade mark infringement, on both… [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
In Clarke v Nursing and Midwifery Council of New South Wales [2020] NSWDC 641 Scotting DCJ dismissed claims for libel based on an email and other matters. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:46 am
This is demonstrated by the number of lawyers across all parties who have served as MPs – Lloyd George, Herbert Asquith, Clement Atlee, Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair, Ken Clarke, Dominc Grieve to name just a few. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:45 am
In other words, the burden of proof of misuse or likelihood of misuse now falls on the defendant. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 12:17 pm
Paris v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 9:09 am
Milan v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 3:38 pm
Clark Neily was co-counsel for the plaintiff in District of Columbia v. [read post]
