Search for: "Clevenger" Results 61 - 80 of 177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2015, 10:23 am by David Kravets
"They kinda made this up on the fly," the trooper's attorney, Ty Clevenger, told Ars in a Tuesday telephone interview. [read post]
5 May 2015, 10:23 am by David Kravets
"They kinda made this up on the fly," the trooper's attorney, Ty Clevenger, told Ars in a Tuesday telephone interview. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm by Gene Quinn
Writing for the panel majority, Judge Dyk, who was joined by Judge Clevenger, explained that regardless of whether the USPTO properly should have instituted an IPR, the decision of the USPTO could not be reviewed or challenged even after a completed IPR proceeding. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 1:19 pm by Gene Quinn
Writing for the panel majority, Judge Dyk, who was joined by Judge Clevenger, explained that regardless of whether the USPTO properly should have instituted an IPR, the decision of the USPTO could not be reviewed or challenged even after a completed IPR proceeding. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 10:03 pm
    Legal Reasoning (DYK, Prost, Clevenger)BackgroundRelationship with Myriad Case PatentsThe Supreme Court has addressed some of the patents at issue here in its June 13, 2013, opinion in Association for Molecular Pathology v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 9:00 pm by Dennis Crouch
On October 6, 2014, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments on the case with a panel consisting of Chief Judge Prost, Judge Dyk, and Judge Clevenger. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 9:17 pm
   Legal Reasoning (Reyna, Clevenger)BackgroundSummary of Asserted PatentsAll of these patents claim parts of a system that is designed to solve an accounting and billing problem faced by network service providers. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:44 pm
   Legal Reasoning Chen, Clevenger, Hughes)BackgroundInjunctions At Issue2004 InjunctionIn April 2004, Bridgeport signed a settlement agree- ment stating that the ’488 patent was not invalid, was not unenforceable, and was infringed by Bridgeport’s 590- DCS and 590-DCSI Speed-SnapTM products (collectively, Old Connectors). [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 2:17 pm by Jason Rantanen
  Judges Wallach, Linn, Clevenger, and Moore “go broad” in over 66% of close cases (Judge Rader was also in this group); Judges Bryson, Prost, Mayer, Schall, and Dyk “go broad” in between 47% and 55% of close cases; and Judges Newman and Lourie “go broad” in under 31 percent of close cases. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:05 am by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2014) (nonprecedential) Panel: Prost, Clevenger, Chen (per curiam) In this case, pro se plaintiff Anderson alleged that nine different disposable undergarments infringed U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 7:33 pm
   Legal Reasoning (Lourie, Clevenger, Dyk)[1] Federal Circuit Patent Law JurisdictionRelevant Law“Federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over cases ‘arising under any Act of Congress relating to patents. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:08 pm by Steven Koprince
 Judges Proust and Clevenger decied in favor of upholding Judge Firestone’s decision; Judge Reyna dissented. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 1:54 pm by Jason Rantanen
Cir. 2014) (nonprecedential) 13-1347.Opinion.3-12-2014.1Panel: Chen, Clevenger (author), Hughes Despite being nonprecedential, this opinion is interesting because it’s the first time to my knowledge that the Federal Circuit has endorsed a “points in time” approach to an intent-based patent infringement doctrine such as inducement. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 5:45 pm
  Legal Reasoning (Clevenger, Rader, Reyna)BackgroundLegal Standard“When a judgment that comes to us on appeal suffers from an ambiguity on the grounds for decision, we have the authority to remand for further clarification. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:21 am by Jason Rantanen
Cir. 2014) OpinionPanel: Moore (author), Clevenger, Reyna One of the main justifications for the doctrine of equivalents is that it prevents patents from becoming worthless as a result of unforeseeable changes in technology. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:52 pm
  Legal Reasoning (Moore, Clevenger, Reyna)BackgroundClaim at issueClaim 1 is representative:A locking differential comprising a differential carrier . . . [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 7:47 am by m zamora
Clevenger of Peterson & Associates in Kansas City, Missouri; Thomas J. [read post]