Search for: "Coca-Cola Company, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 353
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
The Coca-Cola Company which vacated and remanded an earlier decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) regarding the use of “ZERO” trademarks on soft drink beverages marketed by Coca-Cola. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
Cir. 2022) the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) reversed a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) decision cancelling two registrations for marks identical to those used outside of the US by The Coca-Cola Company (“Coca-Cola”). [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
Cir. 2022) the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) reversed a Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) decision cancelling two registrations for marks identical to those used outside of the US by The Coca-Cola Company (“Coca-Cola”). [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:44 pm
Coca-Cola Company, --- F.4th ----, No. 2021-2209, 2022 WL 2335343 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
Marshall, the Coca-Cola Company was more than happy to comply with Eisenhower’s orders. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:22 am
The Federal Trade Commission today approved Coca Cola Co's $12.3 billion acquisition of its largest North American bottler, provided the company restricts access to confidential information about rival Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc., whose products are also made at the... [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 11:45 pm
On Monday, two men who conspired to steal trade secrets from The Coca-Cola Company for subsequent sale to PepsiCo, Inc., pleaded guilty to the crime at the U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:23 am
“Coca-Cola Says It Was ‘Fired’ by Law Firm Assisting Opponent” — “The Coca-Cola Co. is trying to stop one of its outside law firms, Paul Hastings, from representing a beverage cooling company suing Coke for more than $100 million over an alleged breach of contract. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
The Coca-Cola Company which vacated and remanded an earlier decision by the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) regarding the use of “ZERO” trademarks on soft drink beverages marketed by Coca-Cola. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:56 am
A California jury recently ended an eight-year legal battle between POM Wonderful (“POM”) and The Coca-Cola Company (“Coca-Cola”) finding that Coca-Cola’s Pomegranate-Blueberry juice labeling did not mislead customers, even though the juice contained less than 1% Pomegranate and Blueberry juices combined. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:56 am
A California jury recently ended an eight-year legal battle between POM Wonderful (“POM”) and The Coca-Cola Company (“Coca-Cola”) finding that Coca-Cola’s Pomegranate-Blueberry juice labeling did not mislead customers, even though the juice contained less than 1% Pomegranate and Blueberry juices combined. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 2:50 pm
A group of Washington Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. workers currently on strike filed a lawsuit stating their employer terminated their health benefits in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 3:45 am
Coca-Cola Co, the USPTO approved The Coca-Cola Company’s combination marks including the term ZERO, to be used on a variety of beverages, without requiring a disclaimer of the term ZERO. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
The Coca Cola Company, No. 11-11317 (11th Cir. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Recently, a Louisiana Court of Appeal (“the Court”) addressed this question when determining whether a Coca-Cola Bottling Company United, Inc. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
Coca-Cola Company, 21-2209 (Fed. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 11:29 am
The Coca Cola Company, No. 09-cv-06309, (C.D. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 2:28 pm
The sale in question was a Father’s Day sale, which touted 12-packs of Coca-Cola products for just $3.00 – a pretty good price. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
Coca-Cola Company, 2022 USPQ2d 602 (Fed. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 8:01 am
In Coca-Cola Enterprises Inc. and ACE American Insurance Co. v. [read post]
