Search for: "Color Me House IncĀ " Results 61 - 80 of 143
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2015, 4:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Please contact me directly if you would like to submit a guest post. [read post]
11 May 2015, 8:22 am
This strikes me as quite right under the First Amendment precedents, and it echoes another court’s conclusion in Osman v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Whole Foods Market Services, Inc., 2014 WL 5315030,  No. 4:13–CV–3517 (S.D. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 12:01 am by Steve Baird
And, given the color claim, detailed below: “THE MARK SHOWN ON THE DRAWING IS LINED FOR THE COLORS BROWN, PINK, WHITE, GREEN AND ORANGE, AND COLOR IS CLAIMED AS A FEATURE OF THE MARK. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 9:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Too hesitant RT: Sounds to me like expanding the concept of de facto secondary meaning. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 11:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
From left to right: Kevin Leung of Swiss Re; Bill Wharton of Catlin; Arati Varma of Chubb; me; Aruno Rajaratnam of Ince & Co.; Ronak Shak of JLT Asia; and David Ackerman of AAI Consulting. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 11:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
From left to right: Kevin Leung of Swiss Re; Bill Wharton of Catlin; Arati Varma of Chubb; me; Aruno Rajaratnam of Ince & Co.; Ronak Shak of JLT Asia; and David Ackerman of AAI Consulting. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 12:24 am by Steve Baird
And, it seems to me, another good example of a case where the plaintiff has a better chance of proving likelihood of confusion at the TTAB than in federal court. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
The argument under Section 3513 is interesting, but it seems to me ultimately doesn't hold water. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
  If you have multiple iPhone and iPad chargers in your house, you could use different colors to prevent disputes over which charger belongs to which person. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 6:01 pm by Joy Waltemath
Indeed, the evidence painted “a picture of widespread insensitivity towards his disability by managers” since the inception of his employment (Witkowski v GameStop, Inc.) [read post]