Search for: "Comcast Cable Holdings LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2007, 6:00 am
Comcast Cable Holdings, LLC, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (June 8, 2007), the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division One) addressed the interplay between the UCL, the CLRA, and the Unruh Act (Civ. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 9:21 am
., filed a patent-infringement action against Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, Comcast IP Phone, LLC, and Comcast Phone of Kansas, LLC (collectively, "Comcast"). [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 8:36 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Comcast Cable Commc’ns, LLC v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am by John Elwood
Ross, 12-165, seems like a hold for Comcast v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:51 am by Dennis Crouch
LLC, et al., No. 20-1285; Comcast Cable Communications, LLC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Mesa, a case arising from a Mexican family’s efforts to hold a U.S. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 5:30 am by William Carleton
(the AT&T Inc. companies); Verizon Online LLC, Verizon Online LLC – Maryland, and Verizon Online Pennsylvania Partnership (the Verizon companies); Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC; CSC Holdings, LLC (solely with respect to its cable systems operating in New York, New Jersey, and Connecticut) (the Cablevision systems); and Time Warner Cable Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:19 am
Comcast Cable Communications LLC, defendant-respondent APPELLATE DIVISIONFIRST DEPARTMENTCriminal PracticeConfession 'Sufficiently Attentuated' From Statement Before 'Miranda' Rights Waiver Was Suppressed in Error People v. [read post]
District Court judge has found that antitrust claims against Comcast, alleging that the company impaired ad agency Viamedia’s ability to compete in the spot cable ad market, may proceed. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:53 pm
Dale involved a suit against Comcast by cable subscribers claiming that Comcast improperly collected excessive franchise fees from them. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, 12 F.4th 1108 (9th Cir. 2021), which interpreted the California rule (from a case called McGill) as holding that public injunctive relief: (1) is usually future-directed, (2) does not require the class action mechanism, and (3) is distinguished from private injunctive relief, which provides benefits “to an individual plaintiff – or to a group of individuals similarly situated to the plaintiff,” by involving… [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Comcast Cable Holdings, LLC (2007) 151 Cal.App.4th 1224, 1239-1240 [60 Cal.Rptr.3d 631], citing to Gregory v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 3:03 pm by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, 21 F.4th 535, 542 (9th Cir. 2021) (held that the injunction sought was "public" rather than private) Stover v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 1:52 pm by Guest Author Gary Arlen
At the same time, broadcast, cable, and especially digital media managers are calculating how to parse their ad avail inventories. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 12:49 pm by Timothy Zick
Foreign Policy Group, LLC, Kavanaugh wrote an opinion holding that questions posed in an article about a foreign leader’s son could not be treated as assertions of fact for purposes of proving defamation. [read post]