Search for: "Commerce Holding Co, Inc"
Results 41 - 60
of 955
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
Applying the presumption against extraterritoriality, we hold that these provisions are not extraterritorial and that they extend only to claims where the claimed infringing use in commerce is domestic. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 12:16 pm
Valencia Holding Co. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 5:54 am
House of Raeford Farms, Inc., 328 N.C. 578, 403 S.E.2d 483 (1991). [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 8:34 am
So holds Medytox Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:44 am
" Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc., No. 08-3947-cv, Although Tiffany & Co. had probably wished it was an April Fool's joke, on April 1, 2010, the Second Circuit upheld the Southern District of New York's determination that eBay, Inc. was not liable for direct or contributory trademark infringement, nor trademark dilution of Tiffany's indisputably famous trademarks, by facilitating and allowing counterfeit Tiffany items to be sold on eBay. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:44 am
(Disclaimer: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., serves as co-counsel to the petitioner.) [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:13 pm
" Energy and Commerce Committee member Cory Gardner (R-CO) will sponsor the "legislative collection" that will help "spur job creation by removing roadblocks to American energy production. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 5:52 am
See, e.g., In re Brown Jordan Co., 219 USPQ 375 (TTAB 1983) (holding that stamping the mark after purchase of the goods, on a tag attached to the goods that are later transported in commerce, is sufficient use). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
Valencia Holding Co., LLC (11/23/11) 201 Cal.App.4th 74, review granted 3/21/12 (discussed here). [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:03 am
For example, in Coca-Cola Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 12:01 pm
The US Supreme Court declined Monday to hear an appeal by two paint manufacturers (Sherwin-Williams Co. and NL Industries, Inc.) seeking to limit their liability for lead poisoning. [read post]
8 May 2023, 7:10 am
Rebecca Curtin v, United Trademark Holdings, Inc., 2023 USPQ2d 535 (TTAB 2023) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:25 pm
Doskocil Manufacturing Co., Inc. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:57 pm
We hold otherwise. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Grolier, Inc., 462 U.S. 19 (1983).[2] Equating the law of litigation privileges with the government’s entitlement to refuse requests for documents under FOIA presents a fundamental problem. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:00 pm
Repair Co., LLC, 328 S.W.3d 883, 888 (Tex. 2010). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am
Hetronic International, Inc. that the Lanham Act, the federal trademark statute, reaches only conduct “where the claimed infringing use in commerce is domestic” and that confusion to consumers in the United States is not relevant to the analysis. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 4:21 pm
The Eighth Circuit concurred with this proposition, holding in Eyeblaster, Inc. v. [read post]
