Search for: "Commission for Judicial Conduct" Results 61 - 80 of 5,254
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2024, 6:37 am by Yosi Yahoudai
California’s Commission on Judicial Performance, which investigates complaints against members of the judicial branch, said in its notice of formal proceedings that Kreis is charged with “willful misconduct in office, conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice that brings the judicial office into disrepute, and improper action. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am by Maggie Mills
As a result, any proposal for a mandatory compensation commission of the kind established by the Security Council in the wake of Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait would also be dead on arrival. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
The Commissions Clause provides that the President “shall Commission all the Officers of the United States,” which again suggests that the President himself is not an officer of the United States. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
On January 24, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules that impose significant additional procedural and disclosure requirements on initial public offerings (IPOs) by special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) and in business combination transactions involving SPACs (de-SPACs). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:30 am by Elspeth Guild
But the Court held that a controller may be penalised for conduct falling within the scope of the GDPR where that controller could not have been unaware of the infringing nature of its conduct, whether or not it was aware that it was infringing the provisions of the GDPR (para 81). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
Zacharias, 2023 SCC 30 [55] The impact on the Charter-protected interests of the accused is distinct from the seriousness of the Charter-infringing conduct. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
 In this post I’ll simply flag a couple of points that haven’t been sufficiently emphasized yet, or that warrant particular additional attention in light of the CRSCC’s arguments: Chase’s Argument was Focused on Judicial Removal of Officials Already in Office. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The middle clause [2], by contrast—the “Officials Clause”—describes the precondition for someone being potentially subject to Section 3 in the first instance, namely, that the person has at some earlier point “taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm by renholding
§ 202.5(e); see also Consent Decrees in Judicial or Administrative Proceedings, Rel. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
When the Commission adopted the policy in 1972, it included a brief statement explaining why it needed the policy: “it is important to avoid creating, or permitting to be created, an impression that a decree is being entered or a sanction imposed, when the conduct alleged did not, in fact, occur. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:41 am by Arthur F. Coon
  At a later May 13, 2020 hearing, the East Los Angeles Area Planning Commission (Planning Commission), acting in its capacity as a Zoning Administrator and Board of Zoning Adjustment, also adopted the previously prepared MND, approved various zoning determinations and adjustments needed for the project’s retaining walls, and recommended the City Council adopt the necessary zone change. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 8:49 pm by Marty Lederman
House of Representatives (by a vote of 232-197) and the Senate (57-43) determined that Donald Trump engaged in an insurrection on January 6, 2021; that such conduct amounted to “high crimes and misdemeanors”; that Trump’s conduct disqualified him from holding any office under the United States by virtue of Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment (which the Article of Impeachment expressly cited); and that Trump accordingly “warrants … disqualification… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
In advance of the International Court of Justice’s ruling on Friday, we asked several leading experts if they would provide us with their views on the judicial order once it was issued. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 10:30 pm by Maria Magierska
SCHUFA, acting on the grounds of a code of conduct approved by the DPA, had intended to store the insolvency information for much longer, namely three years after registration. [read post]
Since then, however, Wickremesinghe’s gvoernment has also faced accusations of corruption and a lack of judicial independence. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
Ralston Purina Co.[4] Imagine that — the Commission engaging in notice-and-comment rulemaking, including a re-proposal, to address regulatory uncertainty and ambiguity following judicial decisions. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Trump on the ballot without deciding the merits of the disqualification question, would not reflect an admirable judicial modesty; it would instead mark a dangerous refusal by this Court to do its duty…. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 6:09 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
The Jurisprudence of COVID-19 Substantial databases of jurisprudence relating to COVID-19 show that judicial decisions continued to proliferate on a range of issues and deep into 2023. [read post]