Search for: "Continental Common, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 204
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2013, 8:45 am by Thomas D. Nevins
The court stated that Gorlick was complaining about a reduction in intrabrand competition, when interbrand competition, “the primary concern of antitrust law,” Continental T.V., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:14 am
The exclusion is stated in clear and unmistakable language, is subject to no other reasonable interpretation, and applies in the particular case (see Continental Cas. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 9:45 am by Sheppard Mullin
The court stated that Gorlick was complaining about a reduction in intrabrand competition, when interbrand competition, “the primary concern of antitrust law,” Continental T.V., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 11:04 am by Sheppard Mullin
Driscoll-Chippendale (202) 469-4921 JDriscoll-Chippendale@sheppardmullin.com  [1] The following airlines were named as defendants in plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint: Air Canada, Alaska Airlines, Alaska AirGroup, Inc., ATA Airlines, Inc., American Airlines, Inc., America West Airlines, Inc., Continental Airlines Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc., Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., Horizon Air Industries, Inc., Frontier… [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 8:14 am
[*All]Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:14 am by Don Asher
(North Chicago) Continental Tire The Americas (Mount Vernon) Allied Building Products Corp. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:46 am by Mark Theodore
 The Board applied Continental Group, Inc., 357 NLRB 409 (2011) which holds that an unlawfully overbroad rule may violate Section 8(a)(1) in two situations:  if the employee was disciplined for engaging either in protected activity or, for conduct that is not concerted, but “touches the concerns animating Section 7. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm by Tobias Lutzi
Jurisdiction In one of Ginsburg’s earliest publications, The Competent Court in Private International Law: Some Observations on Current Views in the United States (20 (1965) Rutgers Law Review 89), she retraces the approach to the adjudication of persons outside the forum state in US law by reference to both the common law and continental European approaches. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:46 am by Mark Theodore
 The Board applied Continental Group, Inc., 357 NLRB 409 (2011) which holds that an unlawfully overbroad rule may violate Section 8(a)(1) in two situations:  if the employee was disciplined for engaging either in protected activity or, for conduct that is not concerted, but “touches the concerns animating Section 7. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:17 pm
Moreover, inherent anticipation requires more than mere probabilistic inherency, see Continental Can Co. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 4:17 pm by Thomas B. Griffith
” The panel held that the District’s complaint did not state a federal cause of action and rejected the companies’ arguments that “federal jurisdiction is appropriate because:  (i) the District’s suit arises under federal common law; (ii) the District’s suit raises disputed and substantial federal questions, so it may be removed under Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A “heeding presumption” in this situation is contrary to fact and to common sense. [read post]