Search for: "Continental Service Group, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2019, 6:15 am by Florian Mueller
On Friday, Nokia obtained an additional anti-antisuit-injunction injunction ("AAII") against Continental AG, the German parent company of the automotive supplier group, but meanwhile it has become known that the prior AAII, entered in July against Michigan-based Continental Automotive Systems, Inc., was finally served under the Hague Convention "[o]n or about August 28," i.e., Wednesday. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Xavier Beauchamp-Tremblay
I recently had the chance to spend some time on Skype with Antoine Dusséaux from the French legal research service doctrine.fr. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
The court addressed who owned what copyright in computer software developed by a service provider, but where the express contractual provisions left a lacuna as to IPR ownership.Annsley Merelle Ward reviews the ex tempore decision of Mr Justice Carr in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Sotomayor with opinion in Return Mail Inc. v. [read post]
In just a few years, Continental transformed from one of the worst-rated airlines ever to a national powerhouse boasting more customer service J.D. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:46 am by Mark Theodore
 The Board applied Continental Group, Inc., 357 NLRB 409 (2011) which holds that an unlawfully overbroad rule may violate Section 8(a)(1) in two situations:  if the employee was disciplined for engaging either in protected activity or, for conduct that is not concerted, but “touches the concerns animating Section 7. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 10:46 am by Mark Theodore
 The Board applied Continental Group, Inc., 357 NLRB 409 (2011) which holds that an unlawfully overbroad rule may violate Section 8(a)(1) in two situations:  if the employee was disciplined for engaging either in protected activity or, for conduct that is not concerted, but “touches the concerns animating Section 7. [read post]