Search for: "Cook v. Smith et al" Results 21 - 40 of 66
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2016, 10:39 am by Bill Marler
  We have proudly represented such victims as Brianne Kiner, Stephanie Smith and Linda R [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:04 am by Lyle Denniston
  The case was Dallas County, et al., v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 10:02 pm by Dr. Christine Bruhn
High pressure processing (HHP) can protect packaged deli meats from Listeria and raw oysters from Vibrio (Black, Stewart et al. 2011). [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 5:38 pm
Possible Seasonality of Clostridium difficile in Retail Meat, Canada Rodriguez-Palacios A, Reid-Smith RJ, Staempfli HR, Diagnault D, Janecko N, Avery BP et al. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Cook    Eastern District of Kentucky at Lexington 08a0087n.06 Maloof v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm by Schachtman
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 8:51 am
For publication opinions today (5): In The National Mutual Insurance Company, et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am by Elim
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD810 .M63 v. 7Elizabeth Cooke, ed., Modern Studies in Property Law (Oxford: Hart Pub., 2013). [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[42] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no margin of error. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 9:33 am by Bill Marler
Indeed, a principle and consistent criticism of the USDA E. coli O157:H7 policy is the fact that it has failed to focus on the risks of cross-contamination versus that posed by so-called improper cooking.[33] With this pathogen, there is ultimately no real margin of error, and the cost of error can be death. [read post]