Search for: "Cooper v. Holder" Results 81 - 100 of 553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm by Lucy Reed
Classes of accommodation, reserved seats and sleeping berths Except with permission from an authorised person, no person shall remain in any seat, berth or any part of a train where a notice indicates that it is reserved for a specified ticket holder or holders of tickets of a specific class, except the holder of a valid ticket entitling him to be in that particular place. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For the Balkinization Symposium on  Alexander Keyssar, Why Do We Still Have the Electoral College? [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:41 am
In any event, before the Commission starts infringement proceedings, the right holder must send a cease and desist letter to the alleged infringer clearly identifying the specific content that should be removed as well as its location.Under the Reform, to qualify as an infringement, the alleged infringer must: i) intentionally induce the unlawful conduct; ii) cooperate, being fully aware or having enough evidence that the offending conduct is taking place or; iii) where having a… [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:39 pm by Suzanne Ito, ACLU
So on Monday, we sent a letter to Holder asking him to leave Miranda alone. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 1:33 pm by Josh Blackman
Boehner (R-Ohio ) in Washington on Oct. 27, 2015. ( Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg) In House of Representatives v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 8:47 am
Thompkins (08-1470) - police authority to seek suspect's cooperation after Miranda warnings were given Holland v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:34 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cooper Indus., LLC, No. 2010-1227, 2011 WL 553603, at *2 (Fed. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:06 am
This is a group effort of four attorneys – John Gihon, Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper & Bruce Buchanan. 11th Circuit Decisions Gulbalis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 6:06 am
This is a group effort of four attorneys – John Gihon, Marshall Cohen, Roberta Cooper & Bruce Buchanan. 11th Circuit Decisions Gulbalis v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:06 am
[Decision citation: Cour Cass, Civ 1, 6 July 2017, SFR and others v Association of cinema producers and others, No 16-17.217, 16-18.298, 16-18.348, 16-18.595, ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:C100909 - available here in French language)]Legal context of the decisionIPKat readers will remember from the CJEU's Telekabel decision that ISPs were not held liable for infringement but were nevertheless expected to cooperate with rights enforcement measures within the… [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:41 am by Jani
Authorization of infringement was the subject of a heated legal battle in the Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Ltd case (discussed more extensively on this very blog over a year ago) - the very example discussed in the paper as well. [read post]