Search for: "Corporal Nixon" Results 81 - 100 of 578
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2020, 3:03 am by Lynn Jokela
Next, a Nixon Peabody memo points out the government is keeping a close watch for potentially fraudulent activity. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 9:32 am by Paul Smith and Adav Noti
FECA also requires campaign contributions of $200 or more to be publicly disclosed, and prohibits candidates from taking contributions from corporations. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Victoria Nourse
” Other presidents, from Richard Nixon to Bill Clinton to George W. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 3:16 pm by LindaMBeale
  Yet his administration continues to move to change environmental policy to favor big corporate interests and disfavor local decisionmaking. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
Government, in other words, pays for-profit corporations—directly through grants or indirectly through reductions in their tax bill—to influence what these corporations do and where they do it. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 10:07 am by Quinta Jurecic, Andrew Kent
By the time of the 1976 presidential election cycle, Gerald Ford had held the presidency for only a brief period following Nixon’s resignation. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm by Sandy Levinson
  It is an excellent primary source about how a gifted and important law professor, much venerated by his students, was thinking at the time of  Richard Nixon's impeachment in 1974. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 11:41 am by Jonathan Shaub
With the House of Representatives set to pass the articles of impeachment to the Senate later today, Jan. 15, senators are still debating whether or not the president’s trial should involve hearing from witnesses. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 4:00 am by Noel Semple
How do General Counsel lawyers within these corporations reconcile business pressures with legal ethics? [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 3:03 am by Liz Dunshee
This Nixon Peabody memo blacklines the revisions – and explains they could be interpreted to encourage companies to share more information at an earlier stage of internal investigations in order to get full cooperation credit. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
But obstruction of Congress is now all but certain to be introduced as well, just as it was five decades ago when the House Judiciary Committee voted for articles of impeachment against then-President Richard Nixon. [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 12:48 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The rise of whistleblowers over the last five decades is, Mueller suggests, the result of several inter-related factors: the rise and normalization of fraud; the growing interpenetration of corporations and the government; and the spread of secrecy. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  Black and Douglas were, I was certain, fighting the good fight, as clearly evidenced in the Pentagon Papers case and their opposition to Richard Nixon and his associates. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 4:36 pm
  He massively favored corporate farms over smaller, traditional family farms. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm by Larissa Morgan
In response to the devastating consequences of opioid addiction, a Pennsylvania nonprofit corporation, Safehouse, plans to open the first safe injection site in the nation. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm by Nicholas van Aelstyn
When the CAA was signed by President Nixon in 1970 it included a provision, Section 209, that allows California to establish stricter standards by obtaining a waiver of the normal federal preemption rules from U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 2:46 pm by Nicholas van Aelstyn
When the CAA was signed by President Nixon in 1970 it included a provision, Section 209, that allows California to establish stricter standards by obtaining a waiver of the normal federal preemption rules from U.S. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 3:17 pm
Alvin So reunites with his former colleagues from Cheng Wong Lam & Partners, which combined with the U.S. firm in 2015. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Jonathan Shaub
On Aug. 7, the House Judiciary Committee filed a lawsuit asking a federal court in D.C. to force Don McGahn, former White House counsel, to comply with the committee’s subpoena for his testimony. [read post]