Search for: "Corporations A,B,C"
Results 81 - 100
of 7,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2010, 9:24 pm
Furthermore, we analyze Berle’s overall corporate governance project in accordance with what we see as its three core sub-themes, namely: A. the superior effectiveness of internal (corporate) over external (market) actors in allocating corporate capital; B. civil society and the public consensus as a continuous informal check on managerial decision-making power; and C. limited-form shareholder democracy (as opposed to shareholder primacy or… [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 10:28 am
Copyright (c) 2018 Thomson Reuters. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 1:29 pm
“B” does not refer to a subchapter of the Internal Revenue Code, in the way “S” or “C” do. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 8:02 am
“B” does not refer to a subchapter of the Internal Revenue Code, in the way “S” or “C” do. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:30 am
NealonLackawanna CountyBefore the court were Preliminary Objections filed by the professional corporation seeking to dismiss the punitive damages claim pursuant to §505(b) of the Medical Care Availability and Reduction of Error (MCARE) Act. [read post]
27 May 2009, 9:51 am
Here is the abstract: During the last several decades, the legal profession's definition of a "large" corporate law firm has gradually shifted. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 11:18 am
It also repeals Section 363(b)(2), which applies this change to certain mergers involving conversion of shares to or from a public benefit corporation. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 7:52 pm
Oct. 2, 2015)(highlighted here); and C&J Energy Services, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 11:08 am
(b) 8.25% > $0 Del. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 1:04 pm
Corporate Profits $100.00 $100.00 B. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 11:11 am
Accordingly, the exemption afforded under §522(b)(7)(C) is not extended to corporations and the FOIA disclosure was authorized. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:38 pm
Series A also is different from Series C in that Series A grants voting rights while Series C does not. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 12:15 am
In fact, Subdivision (c) has no analogue in any other entity provision of the California Corporations Code. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:01 am
Having worked through section 704(b) special allocations, the class turns to section 704(c). [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 1:10 pm
Owners of two-thirds of Series B and Series C, tallied together, approved the measure, however owners of less than two-thirds of Series B did so. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm
“Large operating companies” are exempt from the CTA’s reporting requirements, which is defined to mean any company that: (a) employs more than 20 employees on a full-time basis in the United States; (b) filed federal income tax returns in the prior year demonstrating more than $5,000,000 in gross receipts or sales; and (c) has an operating presence at a physical office within the United States. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:33 pm
Defendant's (a) filing of a motion for summary judgment that sought a judicial determination on the merits of the action, (b) request for the court to instruct the arbitrator to hear plaintiff's claims on an individual basis, and (c) attempt to remove to federal court did not constitute a waiver of defendant's right to compel arbitration of claim.2. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:42 am
If I am proposing that the taxation of multinational companies' income by a given country should follow approaches A, B, and C, rather than X, Y, and Z, then I am in the normative realm, and a convincing descriptive explanation of why we in fact have corporate and international taxation would not be on point for the normative question, though perhaps illuminating it indirectly - for example, in terms of the set of feasible policies.Before I turn to the question… [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:26 pm
[2] Corporations, limited liability companies and any other legal entities, national or foreign, will pay at the time of registration and in subsequent years a single annual fee of three hundred balboas (B / .300.00) to maintain full validity. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 6:56 am
A Delaware Court again recently denied transfer from Delaware to the Northern District of California despite that (a) all of the accused infringers were headquartered in the transferee venue, (b) the party witnesses knowledgeable about the accused products and documents related to the accused products were there and (c) the plaintiff also maintained an office there as well. [read post]
