Search for: "Corporations X, Y & Z"
Results 41 - 60
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2018, 9:00 am
A big part of our business is strategizing with and advising healthcare startups (for example, a telemedicine company; a medical spa; the developer of a healthcare app—such as, the app analyzes whether your particular genetic makeup predisposes you for a better result with therapy X vs. therapy Y for condition Z) to devise the most efficient “go to market” strategies that conserve capital, save time and keep them out of hot water with the FDA and… [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 9:21 am
That is true (so this line of logic would have it) whether the press is the face of powerful economic corporate interests, or that of communities organized within the non state sector to advance its own views and produce enough capital to satisfy its own needs and objectives. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 11:02 am
Therefore, these entities are out of the new statute's reach.Which offenses trigger corporate liability? [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:03 pm
It turns out that Y + Z = Twitter. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Y on torts, Mr. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 8:49 am
I get that argument for trademark registrations in general, but it seems weaker here, because ISU’s logo is the logo of an arm of state government, and I do think a government can reasonably say with its speech “we agree that X and Y are in-bounds, while Z is out-of-bounds. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 9:23 am
DoJ didn’t pursue those claims b/c it wanted to test the waters on whether rep could say “we are studying the drug for X, Y, Z (unapproved) and our studies suggest that it works. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:41 am
In my field, I don't have to treat anything as authoritative just because X, Y, or Z said it. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 2:09 pm
X, Y and Z? [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 12:04 pm
It has taken over many corporate boards (although not all attempts have succeeded). [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 8:31 am
The resulting innovation enables the fabrication of a semiconductor device package with a reduced form factor in the x, y and z dimensions, which is made possible by embedding an active die within an electromagnetically shielded cavity in the core layer of a package substrate. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:45 am
The owner’s delegation to the operator to do X, Y, and Z for the owner is the kind of relationship that establishes an agency. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(x) Payments received as restitution for a criminal act. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm
(x) Payments received as restitution for a criminal act. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:58 pm
So if you won and you did x, y, & z, and your level of understanding was that win = x + y + z, you could be sadly mistaken not only for the next trial, but more importantly, you would not have “grown” as a trial lawyer. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 pm
Many software advertisements, such as this one by Intelex target top level managers who think they need X, Y, Z, without consulting their staff first. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:14 pm
Many software advertisements, such as this one by Intelex target top level managers who think they need X, Y, Z, without consulting their staff first. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 7:42 am
If I am proposing that the taxation of multinational companies' income by a given country should follow approaches A, B, and C, rather than X, Y, and Z, then I am in the normative realm, and a convincing descriptive explanation of why we in fact have corporate and international taxation would not be on point for the normative question, though perhaps illuminating it indirectly - for example, in terms of the set of feasible policies.Before I turn to the… [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 2:00 am
Data Analytics What most clients ultimately want to know is that a patent litigation will cost $X through the Markman hearing or that an acquisition will cost $Y for Due Diligence, and $Z to close the deal. [read post]
