Search for: "Correction Officers John Does 1-5" Results 21 - 40 of 638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2019, 12:30 pm by John K. Ross
His head hits a cabinet on the way down, opening a 5-inch gash that requires seven staples. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:56 pm by Kevin
The answer is, of course, number 5, because the correct answer is actually number 2. [read post]
23 May 2009, 3:43 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 8:17 pm by Bill Marler
A misdemeanor conviction under the FDCA, unlike a felony conviction, does not require proof of fraudulent intent, or even of knowing or willful conduct. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Sept. 12, 2006) (Order).........................15Tr. of Test. of John Doe No.1, Taylor v.Crawford, No. 05-4173 (W.D. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Complaints up 600% in the last 5 years; no affordable service for authors to use. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:48 pm by Jack Goldsmith, Marty Lederman
Knight’s office began reviewing the manuscript, which was more than 500 pages long. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:10 am by Sam E. Antar
 He does not know when to stop blabbing away, misleading investors, and lying to the media – even during an ongoing SEC investigation of his antics.?? [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[End Notes 1 - 28 are provided following the text below with permission.]Modern disciplinary procedures seek to correct undesirable employee behavior and to rehabilitate the worker. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
The court held that Section 3 did notapply because the Presidency, which Section 3 does notmention by name, is not an “office . . . under the United3Cite as: 601 U. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
2007 Both Houses Bills, With a 8-Day Date Range , Word Search: Judiciary Law Sorted by Last Action Date Search Results Count = 9 Run Date: 04/23/07 08:33 AM Last Action Date: 04/17/07(Results Count = 1) Bill No. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:30 am by Katie Gu
By Katie Gu On January 5, the South Carolina Supreme Court permanently struck down Senate Bill 1 (S.B. 1), also known as the Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion Act, which banned most abortions after the sixth week of pregnancy. [read post]