Search for: "Cott Beverages IncĀ " Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2009, 10:17 pm
The Board found the marks "substantially different in appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression," and in particular saw "no basis ... to conclude that consumers would pronounce applicant's mark 'as COT-TEA, the phonetic equivalent of COTT Tea.'" Cott Beverages Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 9:12 am by Sander Gelsing
DRINK TWICE DAILY - 1,344,388, by Cott Corporation, in relation to proposed use for non-alcoholic beverages and the like. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims: Edwards Lifesciences LLC v… [read post]