Search for: "County of Maui, Hawaii"
Results 81 - 100
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2020, 11:25 am
By a vote of 6-3, the Court held in County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 4:47 pm
No one has challenged the validity under state law of a county having more than a single planning commission (even though Maui County for some time has has three -- one for each populated island within the county), and state law can be read to require that each county have a single commission. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:38 pm
The first case heard Wednesday was County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
County of Maui, D HI, filed 11/26/2014) contends that the denial of permission violates RLUIPA, the 1st and 14th Amendments and Hawaiian constitutional and statutory provisions. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 10:39 am
Supreme Court’s decision in County of Maui V. [read post]
27 May 2020, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court further expanded the scope of permitting requirements for point source pollution under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) in a case involving discharge liability to the County of Maui, Hawaii. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:12 pm
For more on Hawaii's land use law, HRS ch. 205, visit our archives. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:40 pm
In the County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 11:40 pm
In the County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 4:42 pm
Hiraga, No. 29464, the appeal of the decision by the State Board of Registration (County of Maui) which concluded that a Maui County councilperson who registered as a Lanai resident is actually a resident of Maui. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
Appellants then filed inverse condemnation claims under article I, § 20 of the Hawaii Constitution and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, alleging that Maui County had engaged in regulatory takings by depriving their properties of any economically viable use. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 9:59 pm
Appellants then filed inverse condemnation claims under article I, § 20 of the Hawaii Constitution and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, alleging that Maui County had engaged in regulatory takings by depriving their properties of any economically viable use.The Circuit Court dismissed all claims in both cases for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on ripeness grounds. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:53 pm
A source of controversy in the past, the Hawaii County Planning Commission makes recommendations to the County Council regarding land use changes. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:01 am
County of Maui, 86 Haw. 66, 947 P.2d 378 (1997). [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:04 pm
County of Maui, No. 29696, an appeal in the Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals which is considering, among other issues, the question of when a regulatory takings claim is ripe for review under Williamson County Regional Planning Comm'n v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 11:12 pm
" Other sessions include "Hawaiian Water Rights - Where Culture and the Law Merge," "Amendments to the Instream Flow Standards in East and West Maui," and "County of Hawaii Water Use and Development Plan. [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 1:52 am
This post continues the prior, discussing the legal problems with the County of Maui's proposed "affordable housing" impact fee ordinance. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:45 pm
Maui County Council based on the Maui County Council’s passage of two bills related to the development of a residential community on 670 acres of land located in Wailea, Maui (Wailea 670 project). [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 1:45 pm
Maui County Council based on the Maui County Council’s passage of two bills related to the development of a residential community on 670 acres of land located in Wailea, Maui (Wailea 670 project). [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 12:04 pm
The Court’s 6-3 opinion in County of Maui v. [read post]
