Search for: "Cox v. State of Maryland"
Results 41 - 60
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment
24 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
” Hill v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Cox Brainerd Currie Professor of Law Duke University School of Law Lawrence A. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Acker, 527 U.S. 423, 431 (1999), and that he acted “under authority of federal law in the discharge of his duty and only by reason thereof,” Maryland v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 10:26 am
In a partially related development, the Fourth Circuit struck down Maryland’s efforts to mandate disclosures about online political advertising. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"Political Opinion," Expressly Including a Broad Range of Views: Maryland Counties Harford, Howard, and Prince George's Counties (Md.) ban discrimination in public accommodations and housing based on "political opinion," defined (with immaterial variation among the ordinances) as "the opinions of persons relating to government, or the conduct of government; or related to political parties authorized to participate in primary elections in the State. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
As we saw in Carter, the Maryland Court of Appeals insisted upon characterizing apportionment of damages as based upon fault, when it clearly can be accomplished without reference to fault. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Maryland, 486 U.S. 367 (1988); and 4) petitioner was denied the effective assistance of counsel during the penalty phase. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
More recently, similar suits have been filed by the States of California, Maine, Maryland and Minnesota; the NAACP; and a half-dozen individuals who are currently protected by DACA. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
SETTLEMENTS EPA to Allow States Address Rising Ocean Acidity. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
In the United States following the Revolutionary War, liberties were jealously guarded by the states. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IP finance), MARQUES international advertising portal goes live: (Class 46) Global - Patents Using patent landscaping analytics to improve the quality of M & A decisions: a review of Cox Enterprises’ $300M purchase of Adify: (IP Asset Maximiser Blog), Universities reap royalty rewards; investors ignore IP at their peril: (IAM), Top IP-owning nations claim faster patent processing; near harmonisation deal: (Intellectual Property Watch), Bosch, Xerox and Dupont… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:15 am
See, e.g., Fitzgerald v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Those third parties included Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), the Blockchain Association, Katie Cox and Professors Peter Conti-Brown, Morgan Ricks,3Julie Andersen Hill and David Zaring.4 In his amicus brief, former Senator Toomey stated that the purpose for his amendment requiring the Federal Reserve Board to maintain a database was to increase the transparency and public accountability of the Federal Reserve Banks’ master account… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Brian Cox 24. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:58 am
Does this indicate that state legislators in Maryland really don't value marriage as an institution that highly? [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 7:17 am
At Motherboard, Joseph Cox reports that defense attorneys representing dozens of defendants nabbed in an FBI child pornography sting have pooled their resources in a “national working group. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
