Search for: "Coyle Kennedy"
Results 61 - 80
of 131
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2015, 2:02 pm
” Marcia Coyle covered Kennedy’s remarks for the National Law Journal. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 4:17 am
’” Briefly: At the Associated Press, Amy Taxin reports that “[r]etiring Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy on Thursday said he believes it is vital to maintain close ties with Europe and is concerned the U.S. appears to be drifting away. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 7:16 am
The BLT’s Marcia Coyle, the WSJ Law Blog’s Ashby Jones, and RTT News have coverage. [read post]
9 May 2010, 10:00 pm
MARCIA COYLE, The National Law Journal: Well, I think, first, her style is very distinctive.It was hard to believe last fall that she was arguing her first case ever in any appellate court when she took on the campaign finance case Citizens United in the Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 3:45 am
” At Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro and Marcia Coyle highlight a new law review article that offers a “thought-provoking exploration of how the digital age has created new ways to influence the Supreme Court in its decision-making. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:52 am
Coverage comes from Adam Liptak of The New York Times; Josh Gerstein of Politico; Richard Wolf of USA Today; Robert Barnes of The Washington Post; Greg Stohr of Bloomberg; and Marcia Coyle for The National Law Journal. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:34 am
” At Slate, Dahlia Lithwick maintains that Justice Anthony “Kennedy’s thinking [about the possibility of retirement]—over and above the thorny questions of his own doctrinal legacy, his responsibility in the Trump era, and his longstanding dedication to the rule of law—must be immensely confounded by one other thing: He is the most important man in the only functioning branch of government left in America. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:47 am
Marcia Coyle, National Law Journal, July 20, 2010, "Corporate Sector Sounds the Alarm Over Financial Reform's 'Bounty' System" Robert R. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:45 pm
GINSBURG, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which KENNEDY, BREYER, and ALITO, JJ., joined. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 6:28 am
Kennedy, who retired in 2018, was the court's last traditional swing justice. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 7:55 am
” At the ABA Journal, Erwin Chemerinsky identifies six areas of law “where [Justice Anthony] Kennedy was the fifth vote for a liberal result, and where it is uncertain, or even unlikely, that Kavanaugh would decide the same way. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am
” At PBS News Hour, Marcia Coyle highlights “three cases to watch closely” in the oral argument session that begins today. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:52 am
Common Cause, a challenge to North Carolina’s congressional map, “will be making their arguments to a new audience, one that may not be as receptive as the court that included Justice Kennedy. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 4:19 am
At Bloomberg, Greg Stohr reports that “[p]ivotal Justice Anthony Kennedy sent mixed messages” during the “spirited” argument. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am
Jesse Holland of the AP and Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal cover the Court’s decision in Abbott. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 5:12 am
Ayala for this blog; other coverage comes from the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), where Marcia Coyle focuses on Justice Justice Anthony Kennedy’s “unusual concurrence” and Justice Clarence Thomas’s “unusually blunt and unsympathetic reply. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:55 pm
Lauren Coyle is Lecturer on Law at Harvard Law School and Lecturer in Social Studies in Harvard College, where she also serves on the Board of Academic Advisers. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 4:43 am
As an aside, Gorsuch is a former Kennedy clerk and Kennedy led the Court in a series of rulings expanding the rights of the LGBT community, including the right to same-sex marriage. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
” Additional coverage of Kennedy’s concurrence comes from Amanda Reilly at E&E News, who reports that “[t]he remarks by Kennedy, who is seen as the court’s moderate justice, could reinvigorate the debate over the doctrine’s future. [read post]
