Search for: "Crawford et al"
Results 81 - 100
of 180
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2011, 4:00 pm
” As Epstein, et al. discuss, current private ordering (reciprocal dealing, repeat play, RAND terms, etc.) works perfectly well to address real hold-up problems, and the FTC seems to be both defining the problem oddly and, thus, creating a problem that doesn’t really exist. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:35 pm
-Bridget Crawford image source: lifehack.org [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 8:25 am
- Thoughts on the Sources of International Law and a Conception of the Law imperio rationis Instead of ratione imperiiWolfgang Benedek, Multi-Stakeholderism in the Development of International LawBrun-Otto Bryde, Transnational DemocracyJames Crawford, Responsibilities for Breaches of Communitarian Norms: An Appraisal of Article 48 of the ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Wrongful ActsVera Gowlland-Debbas, An Emerging International Public Policy? [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 4:58 am
Top stories today via @ozaz @delimiterau @charispalmer @mumbrellajobs @emma_rodgers it makes sense really: "Google bets on Africa as the next Internet hotspot" http://smf.is/1uInye a good piece by @LeslieCannold: "Time for a reality check" http://smf.is/1uIny4 this is a little strange and concerning: "The FBI Had No Warrant for the Raid on Instapaper, Pinboard, et al. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm
This space unintentionally left blank. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 7:07 am
In the case of Beer, et al., v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
[et al.]Hudson River.The state of the Hudson report [electronic resource] / New York State Department of Environmental ConservationIndia.Energy law in India / Mohammad NaseemLatin America.Latin America and the Caribbean : atlas of our changing environment [electronic resource] / UNEPPeriodicals.Utah environmental law reviewSustainability.Development without destruction : the UN and global resource management / Nico Schrijver ; forewords by James Crawford and Supachai… [read post]
20 May 2011, 4:54 pm
Saxbe et al. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:00 am
In soccer, referee decision making has been investigated as a function of crowd noise (Nevill, et al., 2002) and social pressure (Garcicano, et al., 2005; Dohmen, 2008). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 8:13 am
Title: Al-Odah v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 9:40 am
Lenge et al. in opposition § Brief of respondents Audrey Blondin et al. in opposition § Petitioners’ reply Title: Stovall v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Lenge et al. in oppositionBrief of respondents Audrey Blondin et al. in oppositionPetitioners' reply Note: Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioners in the following case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being granted.Title: Council Tree Investors, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am
Crawford v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am
PennsylvaniaDocket: 09-1396Issue(s): Whether a child's statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial” evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
[et al.] [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
25 Dec 2010, 1:38 pm
” For more than a decade now, those fights have subsided, not because of the emergence of a synthetic consensus, but because other perhaps more immediately pressing issues have seized the focus of the academy, such things as the nature and control of asserted expertise in the courtroom, and confrontation after Crawford. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am
[et al.] ; edited by Junwei Fu, Jacob S. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
PriceDocket: 10-10Issue(s): Whether an indigent defendant has a constitutional right to appointed counsel at a civil contempt proceeding that results in his incarceration.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Supreme Court of South Carolina)Petition for certiorariAmicus brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, et al. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 10:57 am
In other words, engaging in sexual conduct with “mere property” is not a misdemeanor (otherwise, lots of good citizens would be saying goodbye to their vibrators et al.). [read post]
