Search for: "Crawford v. Texas" Results 81 - 100 of 198
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Texas in determining that Virginia’s “crimes against nature” statute is not facially unconstitutional or unconstitutional as applied to an adult male’s solicitation of a minor female, outside the home, to perform oral sodomy. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am by Girardeau Spann
University of Texas at Austin to overrule Grutter v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am by Susan Brenner
(The opinion does not say which Texas statute the prosecution was brought under, but I assume it was Texas Penal Code § 19.02.) [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 8:32 am
Crawford had two arguments: first, that the Texas statutes granting pipelines condemnation authority do not apply to interstate pipelines; and second, that Keystone had failed to meet the showing required by the Texas Supreme Court in Texas Riceland Partners v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
Question: In what basic way does your book differ from that of Jan Crawford’s Supreme Conflict: The Inside Story of the Struggle for Control of the United States Supreme Court (2008) and Jeffrey Toobin’s The Nine: Inside the Secret World of the Supreme Court (2008)? [read post]
9 May 2013, 5:29 am by Jon Hyman
Univ., which will decide the meaning of “supervisor” under Title VII, and University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 8:31 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The Texas Supreme Court also said this in the 1987, case "Crawford v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
’ is not sufficient to meet the pleading standard”); Crawford v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:29 am by Doug Kendall
 First of all, among the photo ID laws passed by covered jurisdictions since 2006, more have been cleared (New Hampshire, Georgia and Michigan) than not (Texas and South Carolina, the latter blocked for the 2012 election only).Second, as a legal matter, amici’s argument relies on a misinterpretation of this Court’s decision in Crawford v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am by Hans von Spakovsky
The Texas Attorney General’s announcement that the state will appeal a voter ID decision in Texas v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
Bennett, and McComish v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 1:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
   The court rejected that argument, saying that, while the Supreme Court ruling (in Crawford v. [read post]