Search for: "Cross v. Stanley" Results 1 - 20 of 121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Welcome to this all-source repository of information for analysts, researchers, investigators, journalists, educators, and the public at large. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Testimony was taken for the record, and witnesses were subject to cross examination. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am by John Elwood
Stanley Waleski sued the law firm of Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP in Pennsylvania state court for legal malpractice relating to its representation of him in a bankruptcy matter. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
There is no single statute of limitations for causes of action alleging breach of fiduciary duty (see IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139; Matter of Hersh, 198 AD3d [*2]766, 769). [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I think the United States crosses that threshold of democratic adequacy, even with the majoritarian weaknesses in contemporary constitutional institutions. [read post]
17 May 2022, 10:43 am
  Hamann hadn’t had an opportunity to cross-examine the confidential source or the non-testifying source (and neither was shown to be unavailable). [read post]
17 May 2022, 9:47 am by William Ford
The report notes that Congress’s reliance on outside counsel “began as far back as December 29, 1818, when the House adopted a resolution authorizing the Speaker to hire private counsel to defend the Sergeant at Arms in the landmark case of Anderson v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am by Vercammen Law
The Administrator filed an action on October 29, 2019 encaptioned Estate of Sandor v. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The lawyer for Gerald Stanley, area farmer acquitted in the shooting death of Colten Boushie in 2018, is alleging he was forced out of a prominent Saskatoon law firm after a “social media firestorm” around a proposed book on Stanley. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In Fox v Channel Seven Adelaide Pty [2020] SASC 180 Stanley J considered an application to strike out certain particulars in a defence as being disproportionate and an abuse of the process. [read post]