Search for: "Crystal Enterprises, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 66
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 1:29 pm
Pine Belt Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Koch Industries, Inc., 273 F. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 12:42 am
Brooks Brothers, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:50 am
(Lincoln, MA) Cls Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Elizabeth Arden, Inc. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
Few enterprises generate as much frustration among their suppliers and consumers as the scientific publishing industry. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 3:08 am
See, e.g., The Saul Zaentz Company dba Tolkien Enterprises v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Drug & Laboratory Disposal Inc., Plainwell, Mich., for alleged violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act requirements for hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Ripmax (PATracer) Samsung Electronics – Samsung files new 337 complaint regarding certain liquid crystal display devices (ITC Law Blog) US Copyright Design law: protecting copyrighted designs: Design Ideas v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) (Patently-O)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog)… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(Class 99) United States US General Wisconsin judge vacates $ 1.26 billion judgment in default against PepsiCo (IPKat) (IP Factor) California Court of Appeal: Von Dutch tradename settlement gives rise to legal malpractice action and questionable mediation confidentiality decision: Michael Cassel v Superior Court of Los Angeles County (The IP ADR Blog) US Patent Reform Putting the USPTO to work for independent inventors (Director's Forum) (Inventive Step) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) (Patently-O)… [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 12:28 pm
Juvenile Solutions, Inc., Case No. 09-cv-02067 (D. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Millbury, MA; Eric Conlon, President) Bandjo Enterprises, Inc.. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Abington, MA; Suzanne Marks, President) Bajak Enterprises Inc. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 2:29 pm
Ainsley, President) 8 Asia Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 am
Hunt Transport, Inc., 331 F.3d 69 (2/5/03). [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:52 pm
American Standard, Inc. (2008) 43 Cal.4th 56, and Saul Alinksy's brief discussion of the recent California decision in Taylor v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC Supreme Court: Canwest v… [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper report – Making the… [read post]
