Search for: "Cure Land II, LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 20
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
California State Lands Commission, et al (San Francisco Waterfront Partners II, LLC, et al) (1st Dist., Div. 4, 2015) ___ Cal.App.4th ___, 2015 WL 5450294. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 12:04 pm
To increase available land for cultivation, community gardens would be permitted in residential, commercial, and industrial zones. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Jaguar Land Rover N. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
First Industrial (“First Industrial II”).4 In First Industrial II, the Court of Appeals of Ohio heard a claim for damage to the residue of the landowner’s property that was the result of the city of Hilliard’s appropriation of the rest of the land. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:52 am
© 2011 Simple Justice NY LLC. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm
Cost to cure: In some cases, it is possible to mitigate severance damages by paying a “cost to cure. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 11:48 am
Division II C.A.R.E. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
The City of Austin took a parcel of land in downtown that was, in short order, folded into a private development. [read post]
8 May 2017, 6:38 am
Massillon Homes II, LLC, 2009-Ohio-5487, ¶ 27 (5th Dist.) [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 9:56 am
., Appellee. 1st District.Administrative law -- Agency for Health Care Administration -- Revocation of assisted living facility licenses, denial of licensure renewal applications, and imposition of administrative fines -- Claims against licensee were not proven where only evidence to support claims was uncorroborated hearsay -- Claim that licensee operated another assisted living facility without obtaining a valid license or qualifying for a license exemption was not proven where evidence was… [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
LLC v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
II. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 6:08 pm
Baird Lands, Inc., 2020 WL 978629 (N.D. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
By William W. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
II. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
., LLC, 837 F.3d 918, 932 (8th Cir. 2016) (finding viable FDCPA claims based on amounts "misstated by $1.29, $1.84, and $0.65" because "there [i]s no de minimis exception to FDCPA liability based upon low dollar amounts").[4]FULL TEXT OF DISSENTING OPINION STEPHEN A. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
FEE-SHIFTING BY BENCH AND BAR IN TEXAS HENCEFORTH TO BE GUIDED BY THE LODESTAR Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Gill, individually, and dba Major Express Logistics, Peoplease LLC, National Interstate Richfield, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am
Stated differently, each settlement reaches farther than a cure based on rewording a label or an ad—effectively eliminating an entire channel of competitive advertising at the key moment when the consumer is considering a purchase. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
If the Secretary has shown violations of regulations involving Class II work and the presence of asbestos, the burden shifts to the employer to show that the violations were not "serious. [read post]
