Search for: "D&M General Contracting Inc" Results 61 - 80 of 769
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 7:01 am
  An affidavit from a claims representative who did not have personal knowledge of the mailing of the earlier disclaimer letter, coupled with the certified mail receipt, standing alone, were found insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to actual mailing of the earlier disclaimer letter: The defendant Finaly General Contracting Corp., a/k/a Finaly General Contractors, Inc. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
[A quick sketch of a longer article that I'm writing for a symposium; I'd love to have readers' suggestions and reactions!] [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
PM Management Systems Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 2:36 pm by Lorene Park
For example, Senators Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Dianne Feinstein (D-Cal.) announced that they had sent a letter to the General Counsel of the U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 7:13 am by Haley Claxton
§ 21.5(m), which states that “GAO generally does not review protests of awards, or solicitations for awards, of agreements other than procurement contracts. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 9:06 pm by Adam Levitin
 in connection with a securities contract … commodity contract… or forward contract…”. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on February 10, 2022 No. 6 [*1]Danny Donohue, & c., et al., Appellants, vAndrew M. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
Decided on February 10, 2022 No. 6 [*1]Danny Donohue, & c., et al., Appellants, vAndrew M. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm by MOTP
Would the Attorney General have to be given an opportunity to defend the statute in the arbitral forum, and if so, would the arbitrator have the power to pass on constitutionality, even if the effect were to be limited to the case at hand? [read post]