Search for: "D Callaghan" Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am by Roy Black
The woman told the prosecutor Callaghan that they had not discussed this type of behavior before and that she did not consent to it. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:35 am by Roy Black
” The witness, under direct questioning from Crown attorney Michael Callaghan testified she’d neither seen nor had any further contact with Ghomeshi after that night in January 2002, when, she testified, he’d yanked her hair hard (not for the first time, which had occurred a few weeks previously during a kissing session in his car), forced her to the floor and delivered three sharp blows to the side of her head. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:23 am
Callaghan argued at length over which portions of the marks should be considered dominant. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm by Law Lady
EXPEDIA, INC.; ORBITZ, LLC; INTERNETWORK PUBLISHING CORP., d/b/a Lodging.com; TRAVELOCITY.COM, LLP; PRICELINE.COM, INC.; TRAVELWEB LLC, HOTWIRE, INC.; HOTELS.COM, L. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
A rare few books that were written by a Justice but discovered long after he died are included in the total tally as in the case of Robert Jackson’s That Man: An Insider’s Portrait of Franklin D. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:36 am by emagraken
O’Callaghan) the Defendant was the owner of a vehicle which was involved in a single vehicle collision. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by velvel
In these capacities he is an officer of the Bankruptcy Court (as has been explicitly held by the Supreme Court with regard to the position of Bankruptcy Trustee) (Callaghan v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 4:32 pm by admin
  I never thought I’d encounter such blatant exclusion in America, nor that it would be so nakedly political. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 6:52 am by INFORRM
This was approved by Sullivan CJ in the Irish Supreme Court in Sinclair v Gogarty [1937] IR 377 (see also Gallagher v Tuohy (1924) 58 ILTR 134 (Murnaghan J); Connolly v Radio Telifís Eireann [1991] 2 IR 446 (Carroll J); Reynolds v Malocco [1999] 2 IR 203, [1999] 1 ILRM 289, [1998] IEHC 175 (11 December 1998) (Kelly J)); and it represents the law in Australia (Australian Broadcasting Corporation v O’Neill [2006] HCA 46 (28 September 2006)), Canada (Champagne v Collège… [read post]