Search for: "D Wilkins" Results 1 - 20 of 218
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2024, 7:37 am by Joseph L. Hyde
App. 101, 114, 784 S.E.2d 188, 197, rev’d in part on other grounds, 369 N.C. 298, 794 S.E.2d 306 (2016). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 5:08 pm by Garrett West
Howard University, the panel (Wilkins, Katsas, Rogers) held that the same three-year statute of limitations that applies (at least in the District of Columbia) to civil rights claims under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act also applies to civil rights claims under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Haley Proctor
Garland, which Garrett West covered in Twitter-worthy detail a few weeks ago:  The Court has now unsealed the opinion (Judge Wilkins, joined by Chief Judge Srinivasan and Judge Pan), which affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the FBI on Agent Laura Ramos’s Title VII retaliation claim. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am by Haley Proctor
Garland, which Garrett West covered in Twitter-worthy detail a few weeks ago:  The Court has now unsealed the opinion (Judge Wilkins, joined by Chief Judge Srinivasan and Judge Pan), which affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the FBI on Agent Laura Ramos’s Title VII retaliation claim. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:50 am by Ryan Snyder
Judge Wilkins acknowledged that Supreme Court precedent required dismissal, but suggested that the Court’s precedent might be unduly narrow. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am by Haley Proctor
Judge Wilkins (joined by Judges Henderson and Childs) rejected this argument. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 12:26 am by Seth Davis
Senior Judge Rogers wrote the opinion, which was joined by Judge Wilkins and Senior Judge Tatel. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 12:06 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The opinion was joined by Judges Wilkins and Walker, each of whom also wrote a separate concurring opinion. [read post]