Search for: "D.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS" Results 41 - 60 of 1,166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2017, 10:23 am by Amy Howe
That is the correct next step, the government contended, because the government’s efforts to appeal the D.C. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 8:42 am
Paulson is scheduled for argument before the D.C. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 1:23 pm by Howard Friedman
Department of Health and Human Services, DC Cir., Aug. 14, 2015), the Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:01 am
Correction: An earlier version of this post incorrectly stated that Clifford Chance’s Washington office employed 60 litigators. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 4:58 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
” The United States, in its response filed by the Department of Justice, does not address the D.C. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 1:41 pm
Some interesting news today out of D.C. in regard to the U.S. attorney mess, the story that gave and gave so unselfishly during 2007. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:12 am by Rohini Kurup, Jonathan Shaub
  If our theory is correct, the Justice Department’s clear statement in its Meadows brief that testimonial immunity does not apply means that, from this point forward, no senior adviser to Trump—including Meadows or Scavino—has a viable defense to contempt for refusing to comply with the committee’s subpoenas. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 8:00 am by Andrew Kent
If that occurred, the legal defense of the President’s action could be bolstered by a recent decision by a three-judge panel of the D.C. [read post]