Search for: "DAVID F. JONES" Results 121 - 140 of 346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2011, 7:26 am by Conor McEvily
” In a USA Today op-ed, retired Justice Sandra Day O’Connor and former Florida Governor Bob Graham argue that “[f]or the sake of our democracy and our economy, it is time for America to reinvest in civics. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:06 am
David Patton, No. 98,470 (Shawnee)Habeas appealRon F. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
 Robert Barnes at the Washington Post, David Savage and Ben Fritz at the L.A. [read post]
” While Jones acknowledged Israel’s right to defend itself proportionately, Jones found Israel’s response “inadequate. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm by Shannon Hill
Expanding the Internet of Things: Four Key Legal IssuesOctober 2020 By David Verhey Verhey is Partner with Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig in Washington DC office. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 3:04 am by SHG
  Any time you take a chance, put an idea into the public marketplace and subject it to peer (and general, as you have no control over who reads what you write), review, there's an excellent chance that someone is going to disagree with you.If you can't handle disapproval, then you should not have a blawg.At Above the Law, David Lat pulled off a monstrous coup in getting Mark Herrmann, formerly of Drug and Device Law, who moved from Jones Day partner to in-house, to… [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Rayborn    Western District of Tennessee at MemphisCRIMINAL: BOYCE F. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Conor McEvily
  At this blog, Lyle Denniston provides a detailed analysis of the arguments advanced by the government and the mandate’s challengers, and suggests that “[i]f Anthony M. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 1:23 pm by Cody M. Poplin, Alex McQuade
F-16 fighters, returning to its base in Guam after the flight. [read post]
3 Sep 2016, 4:17 am by David Post
And the promise to “prevent your employees” from providing such assistance  is laughable – unenforceable and, if it were taken seriously, would require signatories to engage in activity that  also surely inconsistent with US labor law (“Sorry, Jones, but we have to let you go, because you violated my directive not to assist in Hillary Clinton’s campaign …”) It’s the product, in my opinion, of some pretty lousy lawyering. [read post]