Search for: "DAVID P. ADAMS"
Results 81 - 100
of 460
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Lawyers might add to the list idiosyncratic “anti-slavery constitutionalists” like the indefatigable Lysander Spooner or the Ohio lawyer Salmon P. [read post]
30 May 2021, 10:48 am
Benson & Adam E. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Posted by Andrew Gordon (Equilar, Inc.), David F. [read post]
6 May 2021, 3:02 am
As always, the great music you hear on the podcast is from Jerry David DeCicca. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 8:08 am
Michael P. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 5:50 am
Posted by David Larcker (Stanford), Charles C.Y. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 9:34 am
Hickman & David Hahn, Categorizing Chevron, 81 Ohio St. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 2:53 am
See generally 395 Mont., at 488, 443 P. 3d, at 414; 931 N. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 8:34 am
Feminist reflections on the need for grounded critique in an age of crises Kevin Gray, China and the philosophy of internal relations Andreas Bieler & Adam David Morton, Gate-opening political economy [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
In February, it was reported that the UK’s Legal Services Board was moving forward with plans to introduce “continuing competence checks” for lawyers. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 6:03 am
Grossman and Neil P. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 2:35 pm
In his classic book about presidential impeachments, Grand Inquests, Chief Justice Rehnquist observed that, during times of conflict, "[p]rovisions in the Constitution for judicial independence, or provisions guaranteeing freedom of speech to the President as well as others, suddenly appear as obstacles to the accomplishment of the greater good. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 5:58 am
Shapiro, and David E. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm
The Response to Cicchetti’s Analyses The statistical “argument,” such as it is, has not fooled anyone outside of maga-land.[7] Cicchetti’s analysis has been derided as “ludicrous” and “incompetence, by Professors Kenneth Mayer and David Post. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm
The Response to Cicchetti’s Analyses The statistical “argument,” such as it is, has not fooled anyone outside of maga-land.[7] Cicchetti’s analysis has been derided as “ludicrous” and “incompetence, by Professors Kenneth Mayer and David Post. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 3:45 am
Lindsay P. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 2:04 pm
Federal courts have stayed President Trump’s August orders for nationwide bans on two Chinese-owned apps—WeChat, the multipurpose app with more than a billion users worldwide, and TikTok, the video-sharing app that has gone viral among young Americans—moves that set the stage for protracted litigation. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Adams [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm
Adams [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 7:42 am
(p. 748) The judiciary had no authority to review laws, but was required to apply them as given and in most cases did not take the opportunity to make decisions that favour [read post]
