Search for: "DAVIS v. CLOSE et al" Results 41 - 60 of 111
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
Amgen Inc., et al., 15-1039 and Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am by INFORRM
Later in the Opinion, the Advocate General also dismissed the suggestion that Digital Rights Ireland did not apply because the regime in issue in Watson et al was a national regime and not one established by the EU legislature. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm by streetartandlaw
§ 1125(a)) Relief for Unfair Competition Under California Business And Professions Code §§ 17200 et seq. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 8:20 am by Jeff Lazarus
Callahan et. al, Case No. 14-3771, the Sixth Circuit affirmed the conviction and sentences for a case relating to forced labor allegations. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 7:22 pm by Bill Marler
References Bell BP, Goldoft M, Griffin PM, Davis MA, Gordon DC, Tarr PI, Bartleson CA, Lewis JH, Barrett TJ, Wells JG, et al., (1994). [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) before adopting an ordinance enacting a voter-sponsored initiative pursuant to Elections Code section 9214, subdivision (a)? [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am by Schachtman
  If the media want to avoid being hoisted with their own hypocritical petard, they will look closely at the undisclosed COIs in this new paper by Shelton, et al. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
I’ve been thinking more about the Eleventh Circuit’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:22 am by William Innes
Davis et al. as reproduced by Justice O’Keefe of the Federal Court in Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am by Marty Lederman
Participating States must also comply with various other requirements, including those that protect against waste, fraud, and abuse; those that protect the health and safety, and the privacy, of Medicaid beneficiaries; those that ensure that the States adequately accomplish the goals of the program (see the recent decision in Douglas v. [read post]