Search for: "DAVIS v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION"
Results 1 - 20
of 156
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Custodia has a Special Purpose Depository Institution (SPDI) charter from the State of Wyoming that allows it to take deposits but does not require it to obtain insurance from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
These states follow the logic of Marvin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
IPSO 20964-23 The Irish Football Association v Sunday Life, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 22008-23 Hibbert v Express & Star (East), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation 22867-23 Hibbert v Express & Star (West), 1 Accuracy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), No breach – after investigation Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any Statements in Open Court or… [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:17 am
Antitrust enforcers from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are intensifying their scrutiny of algorithm-related collusion, propelled by cases such as RealPage and McKenna Duffy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has opined (see, e.g., Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
[12] Davis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 2:29 pm
Ass'n v. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Yahoo News – Ken Dilanian and Frank Thorp V (NBC News) | Published: 9/27/2023 U.S. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Gill, individually, and dba Major Express Logistics, Peoplease LLC, National Interstate Richfield, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
The University of Chicago law school website shows 62 "full time reaching faculty" v. 127 "Lecturers in Law" (another—and, to some ears, a more dignified—term for adjuncts). [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:36 am
Professor of Law at UC Davis School of Law. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:53 am
Under a line of Delaware cases, a provision that the entity shall indemnify an owner, officer, or director “to the fullest extent permitted by law” provides a right of advancement by implication (Davis v EMSI Holding Co., No. 12854-VCS [Del Ch May 3, 2017]). [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
This Update focuses on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s (“DOJ”) antitrust enforcement activity over the last year under this Executive Order’s direction.2 For further details on the Executive Order, please see Davis Polk’s prior Client Update regarding issuance of the Executive Order.3 FTC and DOJ have been conducting intensive merger and conduct investigations FTC Chair Lina… [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Instead, we write to express our unanimous view the SEC has clear statutory authority to mandate additional climate-related disclosures for publicly traded companies. [read post]
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm
Perhaps the best starting point for analysis of the compelled-speech realm remains Wooley v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
Luxshare Ltd. and AlixPartners LLP v. [read post]
