Search for: "DAVIS v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION"
Results 21 - 40
of 156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2014, 3:21 am
SCOTUS: Five Corporate Law Developments in One Week! [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
[12] Davis v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm
In Buckley v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
This Update focuses on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s (“DOJ”) antitrust enforcement activity over the last year under this Executive Order’s direction.2 For further details on the Executive Order, please see Davis Polk’s prior Client Update regarding issuance of the Executive Order.3 FTC and DOJ have been conducting intensive merger and conduct investigations FTC Chair Lina… [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
For the Grutter Court, it was important that law schools are places that train political leaders—congresspersons, Senators, federal judges, and military top brass—in addition to corporate executives. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 8:36 am
CHARLES DAVIS, Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 8:57 am
The courts, of course, followed by many academics, have a quite different view (Cooper v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:30 am
In Pinnacle Museum v. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 6:53 am
Davis, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 1839555 (M.D. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
Davis’s view, corporate political spending is driven by business decisions that the Raskin amendment may convert into partisan political decisions. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:56 pm
Davis, supra (quoting Link v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
Davis 15-424Issue: Whether the First Amendment protects a speaker against a state-law right-of-publicity claim that challenges the realistic portrayal of a person in an expressive work. [read post]
4 Sep 2016, 8:28 am
Davis case, and so it will not answer the question asked by petitioner, “[w]hether the First Amendment protects a speaker against a state-law right-of-publicity claim that challenges the realistic portrayal of a person in an expressive work. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 am
Sprauve v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Aon Corporation et al. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm
Davies and Marissa A. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
March 27, 2013) and American Express v. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 7:19 pm
Arizona , conflicts with Davis v. [read post]
