Search for: "DAVIS v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION" Results 81 - 100 of 156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Perhaps the best starting point for analysis of the compelled-speech realm remains Wooley v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
But because federal law requires that generic manufacturers use verbatim the labeling initially prepared by the inventor of the drug - here, Wyeth - plaintiff got a second bite at the apple against Wyeth, even though she indisputably never used Wyeth's drug, and Wyeth no longer even manufactured it. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
Davies, 39, had previously been the Hong Kong-based Asia managing partner for the 2,300-lawyer British firm, one of London's Magic Circle of five leading corporate law firms. N.Y. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:48 pm by Schachtman
All opinions includes “a complete statement of all opinions the witness will express and the basis and reasons for them. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
I expect we will continue to see the courts express skepticism about expansive standing under the Lanham Act, especially where the plaintiffs are corporate customers or suppliers. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:11 am by CMLP Staff
In formulating its approach, the court relied on two federal appellate decisions, NLRB v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Hoot has said that this decision by chair Ajit Pai has proved his critics right ‘by backing corporate interests and opposing net neutrality. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
A Federal Judge has heard is considering motions filed by Rolling Stone’s legal team [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:17 am by Rob Robinson
Antitrust enforcers from the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are intensifying their scrutiny of algorithm-related collusion, propelled by cases such as RealPage and McKenna Duffy v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm by Joe Mullin
The Clearing House was represented by Sullivan & Cromwell and Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto, and locally by a Tyler firm, Flowers Davis. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:53 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Under a line of Delaware cases, a provision that the entity shall indemnify an owner, officer, or director “to the fullest extent permitted by law” provides a right of advancement by implication (Davis v EMSI Holding Co., No. 12854-VCS [Del Ch May 3, 2017]). [read post]