Search for: "DAVIS v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION" Results 81 - 100 of 157
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
”[25]  Others have declined to impose sanctions for noncompliance, at least where the recipient is found to be acting in good faith, expressing “considerable discomfort to think that a court of law should order a violation of law, particularly on the territory of the sovereign whose law is in question. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Schwarzer et al., California Practice Guide: Federal Civil Procedure Before Trial ¶ 11:2290.1 (Rutter Group 2014). . . . [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
Schwarzer et al., California Practice Guide: Federal Civil Procedure Before Trial ¶ 11:2290.1 (Rutter Group 2014). . . . [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The Express has published its adjudication and an explanatory footnote, but has yet to remove the offending headline. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:54 am by Andy Wang
Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy sent a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, expressing his “increasing[] concern” that federal law enforcement agencies appropriate the  identity of others without their knowledge or consent and further urging the Justice Department to reevaluate its policies on this tactic . [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am by INFORRM
On 16 July 2014, Nicol J handed down judgment in the case of Cartus Corporation v Siddell ([2014] EWHC 2266 (QB)). [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
On Wednesday 18 June 2014, there was a CMC in the case of Building Register v Weston before Nicola Davies J. [read post]